From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andrey.konovalov@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] media: i2c: imx219: fix msr access command sequence
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 18:57:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240607155704.GB1242@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240607-trimmer-pummel-b452ed15e103@spud>
Hi Conor,
Thank you for the patch.
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 04:50:23PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>
> It was reported to me that the imx219 didn't work on one of our
> development kits partly because the access sequence is incorrect.
> The datasheet I could find [1] for this camera has the access sequence:
> Seq. No. Address (Hex) data
> 1 30EB 05
> 2 30EB 0C
> 3 300A FF
> 4 300B FF
> 5 30EB 05
> 6 30EB 09
>
> but the driver swaps the first two elements. Laurent pointed out on IRC
> that the original code used the correct sequence for 1920x1080 but the
> current sequence for 3280x2464 and 1640x1232. During refactoring of the
> init sequence the current order was used for all formats.
>
> Switch to using the documented sequence.
>
> Link: https://www.opensourceinstruments.com/Electronics/Data/IMX219PQ.pdf [1]
> Fixes: 8508455961d5 ("media: i2c: imx219: Split common registers from mode tables")
> Fixes: 1283b3b8f82b ("media: i2c: Add driver for Sony IMX219 sensor")
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
This looks reasonable, based on the above link.
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Dave, could you check the impact on the Raspberry Pi kernel ? It seems
to be shipping the incorrect sequence unconditionally.
Any information about what the 12 undocumented MSRs that are programmed
by the driver do would be appreciated too ;-)
> ---
> I got the report of this third hand, I don't have a device and can't
> test this. I do wonder why the RPis get away with the sequence that
> seemingly doesn't work for the guy that reported this to me. My theory
> is either that they noticed the sequence was wrong while adding some
> other MSR access that is needed on this board while either cross
> checking the values written or because the other MSR accesses didn't
> take effect.
>
> CC: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>
> CC: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
> CC: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
> CC: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>
> CC: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> CC: Andrey Konovalov <andrey.konovalov@linaro.org>
> CC: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
> index 51ebf5453fce..e78a80b2bb2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
> @@ -162,8 +162,8 @@ static const struct cci_reg_sequence imx219_common_regs[] = {
> { IMX219_REG_MODE_SELECT, 0x00 }, /* Mode Select */
>
> /* To Access Addresses 3000-5fff, send the following commands */
> - { CCI_REG8(0x30eb), 0x0c },
> { CCI_REG8(0x30eb), 0x05 },
> + { CCI_REG8(0x30eb), 0x0c },
> { CCI_REG8(0x300a), 0xff },
> { CCI_REG8(0x300b), 0xff },
> { CCI_REG8(0x30eb), 0x05 },
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-07 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-07 15:50 [PATCH v1] media: i2c: imx219: fix msr access command sequence Conor Dooley
2024-06-07 15:57 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2024-06-07 17:29 ` Dave Stevenson
2024-06-07 17:55 ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-07 18:01 ` Adam Ford
2024-06-10 7:31 ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-11 17:39 ` Dave Stevenson
2024-06-09 21:35 ` Adam Ford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240607155704.GB1242@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=aford173@gmail.com \
--cc=andrey.konovalov@linaro.org \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox