public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] PCI: Solve two bridge window sizing issues
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 18:12:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240611231206.GA1006467@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <253622e9-378c-4699-886e-2240216eef59@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 04:10:48PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2024, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Here's a series that contains two fixes to PCI bridge window sizing
> > algorithm. Together, they should enable remove & rescan cycle to work
> > for a PCI bus that has PCI devices with optional resources and/or
> > disparity in BAR sizes.
> > 
> > For the second fix, I chose to expose find_resource_space() from
> > kernel/resource.c because it should increase accuracy of the cannot-fit
> > decision (currently that function is called find_resource()). In order
> > to do that sensibly, a few improvements seemed in order to make its
> > interface and name of the function sane before exposing it. Thus, the
> > few extra patches on resource side.
> > 
> > v3:
> 
> Hi Bjorn,
> 
> It's a bit unclear to me what is your view about the status of this 
> series? I see you placed these first into some wip branches and then into 
> resource branch but the state of the patches in patchwork is still marked 
> as "New" nor have you sent any notice they'd have been "applied".
> 
> I'm thinking this from the perspective of whether I should send v4 with 
> those minor comments from Andy addressed or not? I could also send those
> minor things as separate patches on top of the series if that's 
> easier/better for you.

Sorry, I dropped the ball in the middle here.  The pci/resource branch
has been in linux-next since May 29, but I forgot to send a note.  If
you want to tweak for Andy's comments, send an incremental patch and
I'll be happy to squash it/them in.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-11 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-07 10:25 [PATCH v3 0/8] PCI: Solve two bridge window sizing issues Ilpo Järvinen
2024-05-07 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] PCI: Fix resource double counting on remove & rescan Ilpo Järvinen
2024-05-07 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] resource: Rename find_resource() to find_resource_space() Ilpo Järvinen
2024-05-07 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] resource: Document find_resource_space() and resource_constraint Ilpo Järvinen
2024-05-07 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] resource: Use typedef for alignf callback Ilpo Järvinen
2024-05-07 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] resource: Handle simple alignment inside __find_resource_space() Ilpo Järvinen
2024-05-07 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] resource: Export find_resource_space() Ilpo Järvinen
2024-05-07 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] PCI: Make minimum bridge window alignment reference more obvious Ilpo Järvinen
2024-05-07 10:36   ` Mika Westerberg
2024-05-07 10:50     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-05-07 14:01   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-05-07 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] PCI: Relax bridge window tail sizing rules Ilpo Järvinen
2024-05-07 13:49   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-05-28 13:10 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] PCI: Solve two bridge window sizing issues Ilpo Järvinen
2024-06-11 23:12   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2024-06-11 23:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240611231206.GA1006467@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox