From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2B9D8BEC; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 01:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718240661; cv=none; b=CWgXmpgSf3+olKsFm/juT4Z8Sfe6YHSdCOWnm47yf34tUWKmx5Kxlm9rH3Tq0Lv8p0Nsf3CZ55C4rEU39BLUcmgPkh5IfR4YFoJOV0zpVg9M4eBqJVFvp8v2UonRBq4FxCUeD6ssfIsHkD82nxUum+duJF1rCkZOMhpltIAn0z8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718240661; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mUqdzlE2YgruqKLE1C3H5e4Ue5/0C4g77p2kLBoVhBQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=iS7BC7Kk99nc7G29RIPeEP9J/9hw8zXGTBF5W60w8orkMeKAKJHxdY6WwB8277nZ8ycYByehnSvwTbpXKyl98lvA/SArBO0GfRN6elGKrX9qVVLQzuYBAPPTIpdX/YcbUtLGPuZMHtvFgj1/HYw4vQK698wsS8kO+/S1sB8rA68= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=hkjYSL7a; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="hkjYSL7a" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF86DC116B1; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 01:04:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1718240660; bh=mUqdzlE2YgruqKLE1C3H5e4Ue5/0C4g77p2kLBoVhBQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hkjYSL7aymQsKlAzq6Yed36s96sUhKIrGVugQoUZuBakuqy5MAFwMb9wDNXMy/8dk ACR/+jWtdDJu4jjEWklpD+2sovBrpkY5/eODSIi6kfyWz1nli+JOxE6wnCctmEFWeO P7AxEm7W6DW2X0F/fKIMb42o3P8ng7mledOqjOSE9uAdgtmBhgDnZQ/mVfkXuAGfVZ o3ufs+N3LwP7cUHVV4ENoAMn2SUtlp8fj0337DU8SoDxfUaBEq5y0Svneg2g95ypda 4H7PQ/LRp3qqwbI/9f+7YKLgSJnCF65JdchVhtlas32NqbtfdnUW3dNtHpbEWdCkWV lT7lmYIFOYLig== Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 18:04:19 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: =?UTF-8?B?QXNiasO4cm4=?= Sloth =?UTF-8?B?VMO4bm5lc2Vu?= Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Edward Cree , Martin Habets , linux-net-drivers@amd.com, Saeed Mahameed , Leon Romanovsky , Tariq Toukan , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Jesse Brandeburg , Tony Nguyen , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, Louis Peens , oss-drivers@corigine.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davide Caratti , i.maximets@ovn.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] net: flower: validate encapsulation control flags Message-ID: <20240612180419.391f584d@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240609173358.193178-1-ast@fiberby.net> References: <20240609173358.193178-1-ast@fiberby.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 17:33:50 +0000 Asbj=C3=B8rn Sloth T=C3=B8nnesen wrote: > Now that all drivers properly rejects unsupported flower control flags > used with FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_CONTROL, then time has come to add similar > checks to the drivers supporting FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_CONTROL. Thanks for doing this work! Do you have any more of such series left? Could we perhaps consider recording the driver support somewhere in struct net_device and do=20 the rejecting in the core? That's much easier to extend when adding new flags than updating all the drivers. This series I think may not be a great first candidate as IIUC all drivers would reject so the flag would be half-dead...