From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Mukesh Ojha" <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>,
"Jonathan Cavitt" <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] devcoredump: Add dev_coredumpm_timeout()
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 17:10:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024061248-scanning-backlight-da0f@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zmm2jC2nx6gZ2WOn@intel.com>
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 10:54:04AM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 02:02:37PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Tue, 2024-06-11 at 10:47 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> > > Add function to set a custom coredump timeout.
> > >
> > > For Xe driver usage, current 5 minutes timeout may be too short for
> > > users to search and understand what needs to be done to capture
> > > coredump to report bugs.
> > >
> > > We have plans to automate(distribute a udev script) it but at the end
> > > will be up to distros and users to pack it so having a option to
> > > increase the timeout is a safer option.
> > >
> > > v2:
> > > - replace dev_coredump_timeout_set() by dev_coredumpm_timeout() (Mukesh)
> > >
> > > v3:
> > > - make dev_coredumpm() static inline (Johannes)
> > >
> > > v5:
> > > - rename DEVCOREDUMP_TIMEOUT -> DEVCD_TIMEOUT to avoid redefinition
> > > in include/net/bluetooth/coredump.h
> > >
> > > v6:
> > > - fix definition of dev_coredumpm_timeout() when CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP
> > > is disabled
> >
> > Got to v6, heh.
> >
> > I still don't think this is _right_, but I guess I'm OK with giving you
> > rope to hang yourself ;-)
>
> I do see your point. But with the udev in place, 5 min or 1 hour it shouldn't
> matter right? But for users without the udev script then a long time is better
> to react and learn how to capture the very first GPU hang information.
>
> >
> > Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
>
> Thank you
>
> >
> > Seems like you really should've CC'ed Greg though since these things
> > usually went through his tree, so if you want to take them through yours
> > he really should be at least aware ...
>
> Indeed
>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>
> Greg, ack on getting it through drm?
Fine with me:
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-12 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-11 17:47 [PATCH v6 1/2] devcoredump: Add dev_coredumpm_timeout() José Roberto de Souza
2024-06-11 17:47 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] drm/xe: Increase devcoredump timeout José Roberto de Souza
2024-06-12 12:02 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] devcoredump: Add dev_coredumpm_timeout() Johannes Berg
2024-06-12 14:54 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-06-12 15:10 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024061248-scanning-backlight-da0f@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
--cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_mojha@quicinc.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox