The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Abhinav Jain <jain.abhinav177@gmail.com>
Cc: dushistov@mail.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org, javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ufs: Add table lookup to set d_type based on mode & S_IFMT
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 00:17:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240613231717.GK1629371@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240613204047.GJ1629371@ZenIV>

On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 09:40:47PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:

> should've raised an arseload of mental red flags.  That loop is
> bloody ridiculous, even if you don't bother to check what other
> similar filesystems actually do in the counterpart of that logics.
> 
> "Table lookup" does *NOT* refer to that.  What you've got is strictly
> worse than the original switch, and that takes some doing.
> 
> NAK.

Note, BTW, that for DT_... values are exactly the same as bits 12..15 of
mode_t.  That's not accidental.  So for valid mode values it's simply

{
        if ((UFS_SB(sb)->s_flags & UFS_DE_MASK) == UFS_DE_44BSD)
		de->d_u.d_44.d_type = (mode & S_IFMT) >> 12;
}

The 'mode' argument is always inode->i_mode for some inode.  Two possible
variants: put validation into ufs_set_inode_ops() and make it fail when
the type is bad (note that init_special_inode() will already scream bloody
murder in that case) or put the validation in ufs_set_de_type() - that
would be

{
        if ((UFS_SB(sb)->s_flags & UFS_DE_MASK) == UFS_DE_44BSD) {
		unsigned char v = (mode & S_IFMT) >> 12;
		switch (v) {
		case DT_REG: case DT_DIR: case DT_LNK: case DT_SOCK:
		case DT_CHR: case DT_BLK: case DT_FIFO:
			break;
		default:
			v = DT_UNKNOWN;
		}
		de->d_u.d_44.d_type = v;
	}
}

The first variant has a potential weakness - you might be unable to
unlink() junk on corrupted filesystem, but then you really don't
want to do that; it's likely to be not only thing that got corrupted
there.

      reply	other threads:[~2024-06-13 23:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-13 20:26 [PATCH] ufs: Add table lookup to set d_type based on mode & S_IFMT Abhinav Jain
2024-06-13 20:40 ` Al Viro
2024-06-13 23:17   ` Al Viro [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240613231717.GK1629371@ZenIV \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=dushistov@mail.ru \
    --cc=jain.abhinav177@gmail.com \
    --cc=javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox