public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/9] x86/fpu: Fix 'struct fpu' misalignment on 32-bit kernels
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 17:16:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240614151404.GA27644@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zmq9ppuIZJ9IMZDr@gmail.com>

Hi Ingo, sorry for delay.

On 06/13, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > @@ -1562,7 +1562,7 @@ struct task_struct {
> >  	 * they are included in the randomized portion of task_struct.
> >  	 */
> >  	randomized_struct_fields_end
> > -};
> > +} __attribute__ ((aligned (64)));

I guess __aligned(64) will look a bit better, but this is minor.

> What happened is that due to my series 'struct task_struct' lost its
> 64-byte alignment attribute, which broke the fpu struct allocation code on
> 32-bit kernels and made the 64-bit one probably unrobust as well.

Yes, and note that struct fpstate has the same __aligned(64), that is
how I noticed the potential problem and decided to check.

But Ingo, it was a shot in the dark ;) I still don't really understand
what exactly should be aligned. Is it the fpstate->regs member? Or what?
If yes, perhaps this member needs __aligned(64) too to be safe?

> ... and would appreciate your Acked-by or Reviewed-by for the eventual
> final version of the series, but I don't insist. ;-)

Thanks ;) will do.

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-14 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-08  7:31 [PATCH 00/10, -v4] x86/fpu: Remove thread::fpu Ingo Molnar
2024-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86/fpu: Introduce the x86_task_fpu() helper method Ingo Molnar
2024-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86/fpu: Convert task_struct::thread.fpu accesses to use x86_task_fpu() Ingo Molnar
2024-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/fpu: Make task_struct::thread constant size Ingo Molnar
2024-06-10 21:13   ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-06-11 12:42     ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-12  8:17       ` Ingo Molnar
2024-06-12  9:40         ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-12 18:41         ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-12 20:30           ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-13  9:36           ` [PATCH 10/9] x86/fpu: Fix 'struct fpu' misalignment on 32-bit kernels Ingo Molnar
2024-06-14 15:16             ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2024-06-15 10:23               ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-16 10:55                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/fpu: Remove the thread::fpu pointer Ingo Molnar
2024-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/fpu: Push 'fpu' pointer calculation into the fpu__drop() call Ingo Molnar
2024-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/fpu: Make sure x86_task_fpu() doesn't get called for PF_KTHREAD tasks during exit Ingo Molnar
2024-06-10 10:01   ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/fpu: Remove init_task FPU state dependencies, add debugging warning for PF_KTHREAD tasks Ingo Molnar
2024-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/fpu: Use 'fpstate' variable names consistently Ingo Molnar
2024-06-08  7:31 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/fpu: Fix stale comment in ex_handler_fprestore() Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240614151404.GA27644@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave@sr71.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox