public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
To: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, irogers@google.com,
	robin.murphy@arm.com
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] perf pmu: Restore full PMU name wildcard support
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 14:43:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240617134348.208241-2-james.clark@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240617134348.208241-1-james.clark@arm.com>

Commit b2b9d3a3f021 ("perf pmu: Support wildcards on pmu name in dynamic
pmu events") gives the following example for wildcarding a subset of
PMUs:

  E.g., in a system with the following dynamic pmus:

        mypmu_0
        mypmu_1
        mypmu_2
        mypmu_4

  perf stat -e mypmu_[01]/<config>/

Since commit f91fa2ae6360 ("perf pmu: Refactor perf_pmu__match()"), only
"*" has been supported, removing the ability to subset PMUs, even though
parse-events.l still supports ? and [] characters.

Fix it by using fnmatch() when any glob character is detected and add a
test which covers that and other scenarios of
perf_pmu__match_ignoring_suffix().

Fixes: f91fa2ae6360 ("perf pmu: Refactor perf_pmu__match()")
Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/pmu.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/util/pmu.c  |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c b/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c
index cc88b5920c3e..fd07331b2d6e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c
@@ -437,12 +437,90 @@ static int test__name_cmp(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __
 	return TEST_OK;
 }
 
+/**
+ * Test perf_pmu__match() that's used to search for a PMU given a name passed
+ * on the command line. The name that's passed may also be a filename type glob
+ * match.
+ */
+static int test__pmu_match(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_unused)
+{
+	struct perf_pmu test_pmu;
+
+	test_pmu.name = "pmuname";
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Exact match", perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname"),	     true);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Longer token", perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "longertoken"), false);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Shorter token", perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmu"),	     false);
+
+	test_pmu.name = "pmuname_10";
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Diff suffix_", perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname_2"),  false);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Sub suffix_",  perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname_1"),  true);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Same suffix_", perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname_10"), true);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("No suffix_",   perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname"),    true);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Underscore_",  perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname_"),   true);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Substring_",   perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuna"),      false);
+
+	test_pmu.name = "pmuname_ab23";
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Diff suffix hex_", perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname_2"),    false);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Sub suffix hex_",  perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname_ab"),   true);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Same suffix hex_", perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname_ab23"), true);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("No suffix hex_",   perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname"),      true);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Underscore hex_",  perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname_"),     true);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Substring hex_",   perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuna"),	 false);
+
+	test_pmu.name = "pmuname10";
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Diff suffix", perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname2"),  false);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Sub suffix",  perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname1"),  true);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Same suffix", perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname10"), true);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("No suffix",   perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname"),   true);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Underscore",  perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname_"),  false);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Substring",   perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuna"),     false);
+
+	test_pmu.name = "pmunameab23";
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Diff suffix hex", perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname2"),    false);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Sub suffix hex",  perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmunameab"),   true);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Same suffix hex", perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmunameab23"), true);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("No suffix hex",   perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname"),     true);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Underscore hex",  perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname_"),    false);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Substring hex",   perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuna"),	false);
+
+	/*
+	 * 2 hex chars or less are not considered suffixes so it shouldn't be
+	 * possible to wildcard by skipping the suffix. Therefore there are more
+	 * false results here than above.
+	 */
+	test_pmu.name = "pmuname_a3";
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Diff suffix 2 hex_", perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname_2"),  false);
+	/*
+	 * This one should be false, but because pmuname_a3 ends in 3 which is
+	 * decimal, it's not possible to determine if it's a short hex suffix or
+	 * a normal decimal suffix following text. And we want to match on any
+	 * length of decimal suffix. Run the test anyway and expect the wrong
+	 * result. And slightly fuzzy matching shouldn't do too much harm.
+	 */
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Sub suffix 2 hex_",  perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname_a"),  true);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Same suffix 2 hex_", perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname_a3"), true);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("No suffix 2 hex_",   perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname"),    false);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Underscore 2 hex_",  perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname_"),   false);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Substring 2 hex_",   perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuna"),	  false);
+
+	test_pmu.name = "pmuname_5";
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Glob 1", perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmu*"),		   true);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Glob 2", perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "nomatch*"),	   false);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Seq 1",  perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname_[12345]"), true);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("Seq 2",  perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname_[67890]"), false);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("? 1",    perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname_?"),	   true);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("? 2",    perf_pmu__match(&test_pmu, "pmuname_1?"),	   false);
+
+	return TEST_OK;
+}
+
 static struct test_case tests__pmu[] = {
 	TEST_CASE("Parsing with PMU format directory", pmu_format),
 	TEST_CASE("Parsing with PMU event", pmu_events),
 	TEST_CASE("PMU event names", pmu_event_names),
 	TEST_CASE("PMU name combining", name_len),
 	TEST_CASE("PMU name comparison", name_cmp),
+	TEST_CASE("PMU cmdline match", pmu_match),
 	{	.name = NULL, }
 };
 
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
index c94a91645b21..97d74fe6d816 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
@@ -2150,7 +2150,7 @@ void perf_pmu__warn_invalid_config(struct perf_pmu *pmu, __u64 config,
 bool perf_pmu__match(const struct perf_pmu *pmu, const char *tok)
 {
 	const char *name = pmu->name;
-	bool need_fnmatch = strchr(tok, '*') != NULL;
+	bool need_fnmatch = strisglob(tok);
 
 	if (!strncmp(tok, "uncore_", 7))
 		tok += 7;
-- 
2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-17 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-17 13:43 [PATCH 0/2] perf pmu: Event parsing and listing fixes James Clark
2024-06-17 13:43 ` James Clark [this message]
     [not found]   ` <CAP-5=fUZkAs9h+fLiJOeL9p_K3auQcn30mXvXZWRYMchmT9ZPA@mail.gmail.com>
2024-06-18 10:59     ` [PATCH 1/2] perf pmu: Restore full PMU name wildcard support James Clark
     [not found]       ` <CAP-5=fUkZnG0gaJ_76Azn643DXZSq9xhpX=+U6Mjhtnko8PyLw@mail.gmail.com>
2024-06-18 15:06         ` James Clark
     [not found]           ` <CAP-5=fVqf0B+Fs8vSAvyPf7UpUo1U8HMkDbgb3csJ4s0O1kiog@mail.gmail.com>
2024-06-18 15:47             ` James Clark
2024-06-26  4:13               ` Namhyung Kim
2024-06-26  9:27                 ` James Clark
2024-06-17 13:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf pmu: Don't de-duplicate core PMUs James Clark
     [not found]   ` <CAP-5=fWzmz+_9-Rz1xPwN0sniGvhyiRtrR-OCqAJgiWybpoCXg@mail.gmail.com>
2024-06-18 10:51     ` James Clark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240617134348.208241-2-james.clark@arm.com \
    --to=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox