public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: John Meneghini <jmeneghi@redhat.com>
Cc: kbusch@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	emilne@redhat.com, jrani@purestorage.com, randyj@purestorage.com,
	chaitanyak@nvidia.com, hare@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/1] nvme-multipath: implement "queue-depth" iopolicy
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 08:56:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240620065641.GA22113@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240619163503.500844-2-jmeneghi@redhat.com>

> [jmeneghi: vairious changes and improvements, addressed review comments]

s/vairious/various/ 

> +	if ((nvme_req(rq)->flags & NVME_MPATH_CNT_ACTIVE))

No need for the double braces here.

> +		WARN_ON_ONCE((atomic_dec_if_positive(&ns->ctrl->nr_active)) < 0);

Overly long line.

But I don't understand why you need the WARN_ON anyway.  If the value
must always be positive there is no point in atomic_dec_if_positive.
If misaccounting is fine there WARN_ON is counterproductive.

> -static struct nvme_ns *nvme_round_robin_path(struct nvme_ns_head *head,
> -		int node, struct nvme_ns *old)
> +static struct nvme_ns *nvme_round_robin_path(struct nvme_ns_head *head)
>  {
> -	struct nvme_ns *ns, *found = NULL;
> +	struct nvme_ns *ns, *old, *found = NULL;
> +	int node = numa_node_id();
> +
> +	old = srcu_dereference(head->current_path[node], &head->srcu);
> +	if (unlikely(!old))
> +		return __nvme_find_path(head, node);

Can you split the refactoring of the existing path selectors into a
prep patch, please?

> +static void nvme_subsys_iopolicy_update(struct nvme_subsystem *subsys,
> +		int iopolicy)
> +{
> +	struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl;
> +	int old_iopolicy = READ_ONCE(subsys->iopolicy);
> +
> +	if (old_iopolicy == iopolicy)
> +		return;
> +
> +	WRITE_ONCE(subsys->iopolicy, iopolicy);

What is the atomicy model here?  There doesn't seem to be any
global lock protecting it?  Maybe move it into the
nvme_subsystems_lock critical section?

> +	pr_notice("%s: changed from %s to %s for subsysnqn %s\n", __func__,
> +			nvme_iopolicy_names[old_iopolicy], nvme_iopolicy_names[iopolicy],
> +			subsys->subnqn);

The function is not really relevant here,  this should become something
like:

	pr_notice("%s: changing iopolicy from %s to %s\n",
		subsys->subnqn,
		nvme_iopolicy_names[old_iopolicy],
		nvme_iopolicy_names[iopolicy]);

or maybe:

	dev_notice(changing iopolicy from %s to %s\n",
		&subsys->dev,
		nvme_iopolicy_names[old_iopolicy],
		nvme_iopolicy_names[iopolicy]);


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-20  6:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-19 16:35 [PATCH v7 0/1] nvme: queue-depth multipath iopolicy John Meneghini
2024-06-19 16:35 ` [PATCH v7 1/1] nvme-multipath: implement "queue-depth" iopolicy John Meneghini
2024-06-20  6:56   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-06-20 14:41     ` John Meneghini
2024-06-20 17:54     ` John Meneghini
2024-06-24  8:46       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-24 17:50         ` John Meneghini
2024-06-24 17:54           ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240620065641.GA22113@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=emilne@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@kernel.org \
    --cc=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
    --cc=jrani@purestorage.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=randyj@purestorage.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox