From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ak@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 04/12] perf/x86/intel: Support new data source for Lunar Lake
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:34:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240620073426.GR31592@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240618151044.1318612-5-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 08:10:36AM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> @@ -77,7 +86,7 @@ union intel_x86_pebs_dse {
> #define SNOOP_NONE_MISS (P(SNOOP, NONE) | P(SNOOP, MISS))
>
> /* Version for Sandy Bridge and later */
> -static u64 pebs_data_source[] = {
> +static u64 pebs_data_source[PERF_PEBS_DATA_SOURCE_MAX] = {
> P(OP, LOAD) | P(LVL, MISS) | LEVEL(L3) | P(SNOOP, NA),/* 0x00:ukn L3 */
> OP_LH | P(LVL, L1) | LEVEL(L1) | P(SNOOP, NONE), /* 0x01: L1 local */
> OP_LH | P(LVL, LFB) | LEVEL(LFB) | P(SNOOP, NONE), /* 0x02: LFB hit */
> @@ -173,6 +182,40 @@ void __init intel_pmu_pebs_data_source_cmt(void)
> __intel_pmu_pebs_data_source_cmt(pebs_data_source);
> }
>
> +/* Version for Lunar Lake p-core and later */
> +static u64 lnc_pebs_data_source[PERF_PEBS_DATA_SOURCE_MAX] = {
Comment and naming are inconsistent, please lion-cove and lnc
> + P(OP, LOAD) | P(LVL, MISS) | LEVEL(L3) | P(SNOOP, NA), /* 0x00: ukn L3 */
> + OP_LH | P(LVL, L1) | LEVEL(L1) | P(SNOOP, NONE), /* 0x01: L1 hit */
> + OP_LH | P(LVL, L1) | LEVEL(L1) | P(SNOOP, NONE), /* 0x02: L1 hit */
> + OP_LH | P(LVL, LFB) | LEVEL(LFB) | P(SNOOP, NONE), /* 0x03: LFB/L1 Miss Handling Buffer hit */
> + 0, /* 0x04: Reserved */
> + OP_LH | P(LVL, L2) | LEVEL(L2) | P(SNOOP, NONE), /* 0x05: L2 Hit */
> + OP_LH | LEVEL(L2_MHB) | P(SNOOP, NONE), /* 0x06: L2 Miss Handling Buffer Hit */
> + 0, /* 0x07: Reserved */
> + OP_LH | P(LVL, L3) | LEVEL(L3) | P(SNOOP, NONE), /* 0x08: L3 Hit */
> + 0, /* 0x09: Reserved */
> + 0, /* 0x0a: Reserved */
> + 0, /* 0x0b: Reserved */
> + OP_LH | P(LVL, L3) | LEVEL(L3) | P(SNOOPX, FWD), /* 0x0c: L3 Hit Snoop Fwd */
> + OP_LH | P(LVL, L3) | LEVEL(L3) | P(SNOOP, HITM), /* 0x0d: L3 Hit Snoop HitM */
> + 0, /* 0x0e: Reserved */
> + P(OP, LOAD) | P(LVL, MISS) | P(LVL, L3) | LEVEL(L3) | P(SNOOP, HITM), /* 0x0f: L3 Miss Snoop HitM */
> + OP_LH | LEVEL(MSC) | P(SNOOP, NONE), /* 0x10: Memory-side Cache Hit */
> + OP_LH | P(LVL, LOC_RAM) | LEVEL(RAM) | P(SNOOP, NONE), /* 0x11: Local Memory Hit */
> +};
> +
> +void __init intel_pmu_pebs_data_source_lnl(void)
> +{
> + u64 *data_source;
> +
> + data_source = x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu[X86_HYBRID_PMU_CORE_IDX].pebs_data_source;
> + memcpy(data_source, lnc_pebs_data_source, sizeof(lnc_pebs_data_source));
> +
> + data_source = x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu[X86_HYBRID_PMU_ATOM_IDX].pebs_data_source;
> + memcpy(data_source, pebs_data_source, sizeof(pebs_data_source));
> + __intel_pmu_pebs_data_source_cmt(data_source);
> +}
> +
> static u64 precise_store_data(u64 status)
> {
> union intel_x86_pebs_dse dse;
> @@ -264,7 +307,7 @@ static u64 __adl_latency_data_small(struct perf_event *event, u64 status,
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(hybrid_pmu(event->pmu)->pmu_type == hybrid_big);
>
> - dse &= PERF_PEBS_DATA_SOURCE_MASK;
> + dse &= PERF_PEBS_DATA_SOURCE_GRT_MASK;
> val = hybrid_var(event->pmu, pebs_data_source)[dse];
>
> pebs_set_tlb_lock(&val, tlb, lock);
> @@ -300,6 +343,45 @@ u64 mtl_latency_data_small(struct perf_event *event, u64 status)
> dse.mtl_fwd_blk);
> }
>
> +u64 lnl_latency_data(struct perf_event *event, u64 status)
> +{
> + struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu = hybrid_pmu(event->pmu);
> + union intel_x86_pebs_dse dse;
> + union perf_mem_data_src src;
> + u64 val;
> +
> + if (pmu->pmu_type == hybrid_small)
> + return mtl_latency_data_small(event, status);
argh,.. can you please go and rename this mtl_small nonsense to .. /me
googles.. crestmont / crm ?
Oh gawd, and the adl_small things to gracemont / gcm ?
> +
return lnc_latency_data();
}
u64 lnc_latency_data()
{
> + dse.val = status;
> +
> + /* LNC core latency data */
> + val = hybrid_var(event->pmu, pebs_data_source)[status & PERF_PEBS_DATA_SOURCE_MASK];
> + if (!val)
> + val = P(OP, LOAD) | LEVEL(NA) | P(SNOOP, NA);
> +
> + if (dse.lnc_stlb_miss)
> + val |= P(TLB, MISS) | P(TLB, L2);
> + else
> + val |= P(TLB, HIT) | P(TLB, L1) | P(TLB, L2);
> +
> + if (dse.lnc_locked)
> + val |= P(LOCK, LOCKED);
> +
> + if (dse.lnc_data_blk)
> + val |= P(BLK, DATA);
> + if (dse.lnc_addr_blk)
> + val |= P(BLK, ADDR);
> + if (!dse.lnc_data_blk && !dse.lnc_addr_blk)
> + val |= P(BLK, NA);
> +
> + src.val = val;
> + if (event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW)
> + src.mem_op = P(OP, STORE);
> +
> + return src.val;
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-20 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-18 15:10 [RESEND PATCH 00/12] Support Lunar Lake and Arrow Lake core PMU kan.liang
2024-06-18 15:10 ` [RESEND PATCH 01/12] perf/x86/intel: Support the PEBS event mask kan.liang
2024-06-20 7:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-06-20 15:58 ` Liang, Kan
2024-06-21 14:19 ` Liang, Kan
2024-06-24 8:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-06-24 8:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-06-18 15:10 ` [RESEND PATCH 02/12] perf/x86: Support counter mask kan.liang
2024-06-20 7:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-06-20 16:02 ` Liang, Kan
2024-06-18 15:10 ` [RESEND PATCH 03/12] perf/x86: Add Lunar Lake and Arrow Lake support kan.liang
2024-06-18 15:10 ` [RESEND PATCH 04/12] perf/x86/intel: Support new data source for Lunar Lake kan.liang
2024-06-20 7:34 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2024-06-20 16:09 ` Liang, Kan
2024-06-18 15:10 ` [RESEND PATCH 05/12] perf/x86: Add config_mask to represent EVENTSEL bitmask kan.liang
2024-06-20 7:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-06-20 16:16 ` Liang, Kan
2024-06-21 18:34 ` Liang, Kan
2024-06-24 8:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-06-24 15:36 ` Liang, Kan
2024-06-24 8:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-06-18 15:10 ` [RESEND PATCH 06/12] perf/x86/intel: Support PERFEVTSEL extension kan.liang
2024-06-18 15:10 ` [RESEND PATCH 07/12] perf/x86/intel: Support Perfmon MSRs aliasing kan.liang
2024-06-20 8:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-06-20 16:17 ` Liang, Kan
2024-06-18 15:10 ` [RESEND PATCH 08/12] perf/x86: Extend event update interface kan.liang
2024-06-20 8:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-06-20 16:18 ` Liang, Kan
2024-06-18 15:10 ` [RESEND PATCH 09/12] perf: Extend perf_output_read kan.liang
2024-06-20 9:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-06-20 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-06-18 15:10 ` [RESEND PATCH 10/12] perf/x86/intel: Move PEBS event update after the sample output kan.liang
2024-06-18 15:10 ` [RESEND PATCH 11/12] perf/x86/intel: Support PEBS counters snapshotting kan.liang
2024-06-18 15:10 ` [RESEND PATCH 12/12] perf/x86/intel: Support RDPMC metrics clear mode kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240620073426.GR31592@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox