* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review
2024-06-25 9:32 [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-06-25 11:23 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-06-25 15:54 ` Peter Schneider
` (11 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-06-25 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 25/06/2024 10:32, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.96 release.
> There are 131 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:54:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.96-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review
2024-06-25 9:32 [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-06-25 11:23 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-06-25 15:54 ` Peter Schneider
2024-06-25 17:04 ` SeongJae Park
` (10 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Peter Schneider @ 2024-06-25 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
Am 25.06.2024 um 11:32 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.96 release.
> There are 131 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
No regressions on my 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon E5-2697 v2 machine. Builds, boots, works,
nothing odd in dmesg output.
Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>
Beste Grüße,
Peter Schneider
--
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you. -- David McCullough Jr.
OpenPGP: 0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@googlemail.com
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review
2024-06-25 9:32 [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-06-25 11:23 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-06-25 15:54 ` Peter Schneider
@ 2024-06-25 17:04 ` SeongJae Park
2024-06-25 18:02 ` Mark Brown
` (9 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2024-06-25 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: SeongJae Park, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, damon
Hello,
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:32:35 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.96 release.
> There are 131 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:54:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.96-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below. Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].
Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
[1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] 80ee32f97e81 ("Linux 6.1.96-rc1")
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
---
ok 1 selftests: damon: debugfs_attrs.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon: debugfs_schemes.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon: debugfs_empty_targets.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon: debugfs_huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon: debugfs_duplicate_context_creation.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon: sysfs.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_m68k.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
[33m
[92mPASS [39m
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review
2024-06-25 9:32 [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-25 17:04 ` SeongJae Park
@ 2024-06-25 18:02 ` Mark Brown
2024-06-25 21:29 ` Shuah Khan
` (8 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2024-06-25 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 11:32:35AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.96 release.
> There are 131 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review
2024-06-25 9:32 [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-25 18:02 ` Mark Brown
@ 2024-06-25 21:29 ` Shuah Khan
2024-06-26 8:02 ` Jon Hunter
` (7 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-06-25 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, Shuah Khan
On 6/25/24 03:32, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.96 release.
> There are 131 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:54:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.96-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review
2024-06-25 9:32 [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-25 21:29 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2024-06-26 8:02 ` Jon Hunter
2024-06-26 10:36 ` Shreeya Patel
` (6 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-06-26 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:32:35 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.96 release.
> There are 131 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:54:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.96-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.1:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 116 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.1.96-rc1-g80ee32f97e81
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review
2024-06-25 9:32 [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-26 8:02 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-06-26 10:36 ` Shreeya Patel
2024-06-26 12:21 ` Allen
` (5 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Shreeya Patel @ 2024-06-26 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
kernelci-regressions mailing list, Gustavo Padovan
On Tuesday, June 25, 2024 15:02 IST, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.96 release.
> There are 131 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:54:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.96-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
KernelCI report for stable-rc/linux-6.1.y for this week :-
Date: 2024-06-25
## Build failures:
No **new** build failures seen for the stable-rc/linux-6.1.y commit head \o/
Tested-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org>
Thanks,
Shreeya Patel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review
2024-06-25 9:32 [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-26 10:36 ` Shreeya Patel
@ 2024-06-26 12:21 ` Allen
2024-06-26 12:51 ` Ron Economos
` (4 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Allen @ 2024-06-26 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, broonie
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.96 release.
> There are 131 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:54:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.96-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.
Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review
2024-06-25 9:32 [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-26 12:21 ` Allen
@ 2024-06-26 12:51 ` Ron Economos
2024-06-26 19:13 ` Mateusz Jończyk
` (3 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2024-06-26 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 6/25/24 2:32 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.96 release.
> There are 131 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:54:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.96-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review
2024-06-25 9:32 [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-26 12:51 ` Ron Economos
@ 2024-06-26 19:13 ` Mateusz Jończyk
2024-06-26 19:51 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (2 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mateusz Jończyk @ 2024-06-26 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
W dniu 25.06.2024 o 11:32, Greg Kroah-Hartman pisze:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.96 release.
> There are 131 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:54:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.96-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hello,
Tested-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Tested on a HP 17-by0001nw laptop with an Intel Kaby Lake CPU and Ubuntu 20.04.
Issues found:
- NVMe drive failed shortly after resume from suspend:
pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER: Corrected error message received from 0000:00:1d.0
pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Physical Layer, (Receiver ID)
pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: device [8086:9d18] error status/mask=00000001/00002000
pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: [ 0] RxErr
[... repeats around 20 times ]
nvme nvme0: controller is down; will reset: CSTS=0xffffffff, PCI_STATUS=0x10
nvme nvme0: Does your device have a faulty power saving mode enabled?
nvme nvme0: Try "nvme_core.default_ps_max_latency_us=0 pcie_aspm=off" and report a bug
nvme 0000:03:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
nvme nvme0: Removing after probe failure status: -19
nvme0n1: detected capacity change from 1000215216 to 0
[...]
md/raid1:md1: Disk failure on nvme0n1p3, disabling device.
md/raid1:md1: Operation continuing on 1 devices.
After a cold reboot, the drive is visible again and functioning apparently
normally. SMART data claims it is healthy. Previously this happened 3 weeks
ago, on Linux 5.15.0-107-generic from Ubuntu, also shortly after a resume
from suspend. As no recent patches in Linux stable appear to touch NVMe / PCIe,
I'm giving a Tested-by: nonetheless.
Stack:
- amd64,
- ext4 on top of LVM on top of LUKS on top of mdraid on top of
NVMe and SATA drives (the SATA drive in a write-mostly mode).
Tested (lightly):
- suspend to RAM,
- suspend to disk,
- virtual machines in QEMU (both i386 and amd64 guests),
- Bluetooth (Realtek RTL8822BE),
- GPU (Intel HD Graphics 620, tested with two Unigine benchmarks)
- WiFi (Realtek RTL8822BE),
- webcam.
Filesystems tested with fsstress:
- ext4,
- NFS client,
- exFAT,
- NTFS via FUSE (ntfs3g).
Greetings,
Mateusz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review
2024-06-25 9:32 [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-26 19:13 ` Mateusz Jończyk
@ 2024-06-26 19:51 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-06-27 3:32 ` Kelsey Steele
2024-06-28 19:26 ` Pavel Machek
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-06-26 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 at 15:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.96 release.
> There are 131 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:54:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.96-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 6.1.96-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 80ee32f97e81cdbd2585b8b81e943f50e8078a08
* git describe: v6.1.95-132-g80ee32f97e81
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.95-132-g80ee32f97e81
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.94-218-g0891d95b9db3)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.94-218-g0891d95b9db3)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.94-218-g0891d95b9db3)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.94-218-g0891d95b9db3)
## Test result summary
total: 237419, pass: 204833, fail: 2499, skip: 29697, xfail: 390
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 133 total, 133 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 31 total, 31 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselft[
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-timesync-off
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-smoketest
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review
2024-06-25 9:32 [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-26 19:51 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-06-27 3:32 ` Kelsey Steele
2024-06-28 19:26 ` Pavel Machek
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Kelsey Steele @ 2024-06-27 3:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 11:32:35AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.96 release.
> There are 131 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:54:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
No regressions found on WSL (x86 and arm64).
Built, booted, and reviewed dmesg.
Thank you. :)
Tested-by: Kelsey Steele <kelseysteele@linux.microsoft.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review
2024-06-25 9:32 [PATCH 6.1 000/131] 6.1.96-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-27 3:32 ` Kelsey Steele
@ 2024-06-28 19:26 ` Pavel Machek
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-06-28 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 783 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.96 release.
> There are 131 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:54:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.1.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread