From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/17] coredump: Consolidate the work to allow SIGKILL during coredumps
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:34:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240625123444.GB16836@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877celinkf.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>
On 06/18, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> --- a/fs/coredump.c
> +++ b/fs/coredump.c
> @@ -366,18 +366,17 @@ static int zap_process(struct task_struct *start, int exit_code)
> struct task_struct *t;
> int nr = 0;
>
> - /* Allow SIGKILL, see prepare_signal() */
> start->signal->flags = SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT;
> start->signal->group_exit_code = exit_code;
> start->signal->group_stop_count = 0;
>
> for_each_thread(start, t) {
> task_clear_jobctl_pending(t, JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK);
> - if (t != current && !(t->flags & PF_POSTCOREDUMP)) {
> + if (!(t->flags & PF_POSTCOREDUMP)) {
> sigaddset(&t->pending.signal, SIGKILL);
> signal_wake_up(t, 1);
> - nr++;
> }
> + nr += (t != current) && !(t->flags & PF_POSTCOREDUMP);
> }
>
> return nr;
> @@ -393,9 +392,12 @@ static int zap_threads(struct task_struct *tsk,
> if (!(signal->flags & SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT) && !signal->group_exec_task) {
> signal->core_state = core_state;
> nr = zap_process(tsk, exit_code);
> + atomic_set(&core_state->nr_threads, nr);
> +
> + /* Allow SIGKILL, see prepare_signal() */
> clear_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_SIGPENDING);
> + sigdelset(&tsk->pending.signal, SIGKILL);
> tsk->flags |= PF_DUMPCORE;
> - atomic_set(&core_state->nr_threads, nr);
> }
> spin_unlock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
> return nr;
I fail to understand... Why do we want to add SIGKILL to the current task
in zap_process() and then clear it in the caller?
Perhaps I need to read the next patches to understand the purpose, but this
looks very confusing.
And even if this makes sense after the next patches, to me
nr += (t != current) && !(t->flags & PF_POSTCOREDUMP);
doesn't look very nice. Say, zap_process() could just do
for_each_thread(start, t) {
task_clear_jobctl_pending(t, JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK);
if (!(t->flags & PF_POSTCOREDUMP)) {
sigaddset(&t->pending.signal, SIGKILL);
signal_wake_up(t, 1);
nr++;
}
}
and in zap_threads()
- atomic_set(&core_state->nr_threads, nr);
+ atomic_set(&core_state->nr_threads, nr - 1);
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And this reminds me that zap_process() doesn't look very nice after the commit
0258b5fd7c7124b87e18 ("coredump: Limit coredumps to a single thread group"),
I'll send a simple cleanup today...
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-25 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-09 14:23 [PATCH 0/1] exit: kill signal_struct->quick_threads Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-09 14:24 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-09 18:28 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 10:50 ` Q: css_task_iter_advance() && dying_tasks Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 11:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 20:02 ` Tejun Heo
2024-06-10 20:00 ` Tejun Heo
2024-06-10 12:15 ` [PATCH 0/1] exit: kill signal_struct->quick_threads Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-10 15:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 15:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 16:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-13 15:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-15 14:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-17 18:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 3:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:04 ` [PATCH 0/17] exit: complete synchronize_group_exit Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:05 ` [PATCH 01/17] signal: Make SIGKILL during coredumps an explicit special case Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 15:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 18:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 19:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-21 5:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-21 10:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-21 16:30 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:05 ` [PATCH 02/17] signal: Compute the process exit_code in get_signal Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-25 12:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 4:06 ` [PATCH 03/17] coredump: Consolidate the work to allow SIGKILL during coredumps Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-25 12:34 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2024-06-19 4:06 ` [PATCH 04/17] signal: In get_signal call do_exit when it is unnecessary to shoot down threads Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-25 12:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 4:07 ` [PATCH 05/17] signal: Bring down all threads when handling a non-coredump fatal signal Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-25 12:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 4:07 ` [PATCH 06/17] signal: Add JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT to mark exiting tasks Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:08 ` [PATCH 07/17] signal: Always set JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT for " Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-30 14:00 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-19 4:08 ` [PATCH 08/17] signal: Don't target tasks that are exiting Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:09 ` [PATCH 09/17] signal: Test for process exit or de_thread using task_exit_pending Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:09 ` [PATCH 10/17] signal: Only set JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT if it is not already set Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:10 ` [PATCH 11/17] signal: Make individual tasks exiting a first class concept Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:10 ` [PATCH 12/17] signal: Remove zap_other_threads Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:11 ` [PATCH 13/17] signal: Stop skipping current in do_group_exit & get_signal Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-28 5:43 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-19 4:11 ` [PATCH 14/17] signal: Factor out schedule_group_exit_locked Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:12 ` [PATCH 15/17] ptrace: Separate task->ptrace_code out from task->exit_code Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:12 ` [PATCH 16/17] signal: Record the exit_code when an exit is scheduled Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:13 ` [PATCH 17/17] signal: Set SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT when all tasks have decided to exit Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 20:18 ` [PATCH 0/1] exit: kill signal_struct->quick_threads Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240625123444.GB16836@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox