From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: sahanlb <sahanb@bu.edu>
Cc: jasowang@redhat.com, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
drepper@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-pci: PCI extended capabilities for virtio
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:50:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240625154900-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240625184043.10658-1-sahanb@bu.edu>
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 02:39:37PM -0400, sahanlb wrote:
> PCI legacy configuration space does not have sufficient space for a device
> that supports all kinds of virtio structures via PCI capabilities. This is
> especially true if one were to use virtio drivers with physical devices.
> Link: https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10463939
> A physical device may already have many capabilities in the legacy space.
>
> This patch adds support to place virtio capabilities in the PCI extended
> configuration space and makes the driver search both legacy and extended
> PCI configuration spaces.
>
> Add new argument to vp_modern_map_capability to indicate whether mapping
> a legacy or extended capability.
> Add new function virtio_pci_find_ext_capability to walk extended
> capabilities and find virtio capabilities.
>
> Modify vp_modern_probe to search both legacy and extended configuration
> spaces.
> If virtio_pci_find_capability fails to find common, isr, notify, or device
> virtio structures, call virtio_pci_find_ext_capability.
>
> Notify virtio structure can get mapped either in vp_modern_probe or in
> vp_modern_map_vq_notify. Add new attribute 'notify_ecap' to
> struct virtio_pci_modern_device to indicate whether the notify capability
> is in the extended congiguration structure.
>
> Add virtio extended capability structures to
> "include/uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h".
> Format for the extended structures derived from
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220112055755.41011-2-jasowang@redhat.com/
>
> This patch has been validated using an FPGA development board to implement
> a virtio interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: sahanlb <sahanb@bu.edu>
Thanks for the patch! As any UAPI change, this one has to also
be accompanied by a spec patch documenting the capabilities.
...
> +struct virtio_pci_cfg_ecap {
> + struct virtio_pci_ecap cap;
> + __u8 pci_cfg_data[4]; /* Data for BAR access. */
> +};
Hmm, a weird thing to do. The reason we have it is because
a legacy bios has trouble accessing BAR directly (e.g. if BAR
is 64 bit). Is there still an issue even for bios with
support for pcie extended config space?
> +
> /* Macro versions of offsets for the Old Timers! */
> #define VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_VNDR 0
> #define VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_NEXT 1
This comes at an interesting time, there is an interest
in order to get virtio working over EP protocol,
in exposing all this information as part of a BAR
as opposed as a capability. I wonder whether that's
also palatable.
> --
> 2.42.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-25 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-25 18:39 [PATCH] virtio-pci: PCI extended capabilities for virtio sahanlb
2024-06-25 22:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2024-06-26 1:57 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240625154900-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sahanb@bu.edu \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox