From: Tianchen Ding <dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: Make SCHED_IDLE entity be preempted in strict hierarchy
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 10:35:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240626023505.1332596-1-dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
Consider the following cgroup:
root
|
------------------------
| |
normal_cgroup idle_cgroup
| |
SCHED_IDLE task_A SCHED_NORMAL task_B
According to the cgroup hierarchy, A should preempt B. But current
check_preempt_wakeup_fair() treats cgroup se and task separately, so B
will preempt A unexpectedly.
Unify the wakeup logic by {c,p}se_is_idle only. This makes SCHED_IDLE of
a task a relative policy that is effective only within its own cgroup,
similar to the behavior of NICE.
Also fix se_is_idle() definition when !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED.
Fixes: 304000390f88 ("sched: Cgroup SCHED_IDLE support")
Signed-off-by: Tianchen Ding <dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
---
v2:
Use entity_is_task() to check whether pse is a task.
Improve comments and commit log.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240624073900.10343-1-dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com/
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 41b58387023d..f0b038de99ce 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ static int cfs_rq_is_idle(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
static int se_is_idle(struct sched_entity *se)
{
- return 0;
+ return task_has_idle_policy(task_of(se));
}
#endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
@@ -8382,16 +8382,7 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
if (test_tsk_need_resched(curr))
return;
- /* Idle tasks are by definition preempted by non-idle tasks. */
- if (unlikely(task_has_idle_policy(curr)) &&
- likely(!task_has_idle_policy(p)))
- goto preempt;
-
- /*
- * Batch and idle tasks do not preempt non-idle tasks (their preemption
- * is driven by the tick):
- */
- if (unlikely(p->policy != SCHED_NORMAL) || !sched_feat(WAKEUP_PREEMPTION))
+ if (!sched_feat(WAKEUP_PREEMPTION))
return;
find_matching_se(&se, &pse);
@@ -8401,7 +8392,7 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
pse_is_idle = se_is_idle(pse);
/*
- * Preempt an idle group in favor of a non-idle group (and don't preempt
+ * Preempt an idle entity in favor of a non-idle entity (and don't preempt
* in the inverse case).
*/
if (cse_is_idle && !pse_is_idle)
@@ -8409,6 +8400,15 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
if (cse_is_idle != pse_is_idle)
return;
+ /*
+ * Batch tasks do not preempt non-idle tasks (their preemption
+ * is driven by the tick).
+ * We've done the check about "only one of the entities is idle",
+ * so cse must be non-idle if p is a batch task.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(entity_is_task(pse) && p->policy == SCHED_BATCH))
+ return;
+
cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
update_curr(cfs_rq);
--
2.39.3
next reply other threads:[~2024-06-26 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-26 2:35 Tianchen Ding [this message]
2024-07-04 8:15 ` [PATCH v2] sched/fair: Make SCHED_IDLE entity be preempted in strict hierarchy Tianchen Ding
2024-07-08 12:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-07-08 12:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2024-07-08 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-07-09 13:42 ` Tianchen Ding
2024-07-09 18:28 ` Josh Don
2024-07-29 10:34 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Tianchen Ding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240626023505.1332596-1-dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox