From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E3C752F74; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:22:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719476557; cv=none; b=Tw9HsvPvOYzf5KbhkoyAns5XVXiBgs64dk+ZYimId4CGvGGJRry/YLpPPb2HIzG7XCLa9Ap4U7wN/Nr1wPQ15dapwvppPfw5VwgpCYHaVGNzvncL7ONftw7e6oQdYsJIrH9G2X9i52xWboFHzOazf/61IFmxASTD7zNOSLPB3QY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719476557; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ve6FElwrMclzljUDMaNF6VU5q8bjO760NGenyBWusIg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=uWaM/0JIIuqdanrl9nB3/ed2KB1AtG0ckJ+InrPfxNLy0qA7utVfSUPfXKLhT+y4rKEIVt6YgLb1KqM5dLx71xgY+1sgpay1fdLhMh9OBXfGJBelz9IN/XyWmzhJLkDBm0lCyEwzvMdT+Y404+QeKvSDmZ5pKd33PccQC4dWukM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=egYZCUA0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="egYZCUA0" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 611D9C2BBFC; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:22:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1719476556; bh=Ve6FElwrMclzljUDMaNF6VU5q8bjO760NGenyBWusIg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=egYZCUA08OmGPu1wGh4ztTVLfV7eiwHaicMKwbf0rDYF/Ofxre2MFAv1qIMfXYUKK nS3uJKh3QcFDvNZAVIjXmdu/yYE6kiMp2ob96mL4191aocOiCriBFasw1xWr9jF4v8 EwRsRPjR7B7xEK0H7KLJ5MP2QMyFtQ9xlWHtPYaOvqYsTJLcRY2H/FO9DDKWcx0vyO gEfo2Xjm1ZGmQRkeimFZ0+dAAyDcMNl/DyHusctFb+YbEvCMxiRAO7IaGqTcq2M67V 6JgdXE/UfMCYVvawhBUbYixV4wwZUrh7NukB0e9xqltYeurR1ya3jvahVPW1aDOMTJ NFgjyvmCQyfvw== Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 09:22:32 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Markus Elfring Cc: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Christian Marangi , Julia Lawall , Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [3/3] leds: leds-lp55xx: Convert mutex lock/unlock to guard API Message-ID: <20240627082232.GG2532839@google.com> References: <20240626221520.2846-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> <20240626221520.2846-3-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> <20240627070909.GD2532839@google.com> <873c2900-859d-40eb-97df-f45f714ed295@web.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <873c2900-859d-40eb-97df-f45f714ed295@web.de> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024, Markus Elfring wrote: > >>> Convert any entry of mutex lock/unlock to guard API and simplify code. > >> > >> Thanks that you would like to support another bit of collateral evolution. > >> > >> * Would you get into the mood to benefit any more from applications > >> of scope-based resource management? > > > > Why don't you submit them yourself instead of asking others to do work? > > 1. The change resistance (or acceptance) is varying for possible software transformations > in wide ranges, isn't it? How would that be any different for anyone else? Resistance/acceptance should be based on patch quality alone. > 2. I would appreciate better support and collaboration with additional development resources. In what regard? Make the changes and submit them. What additional resources could you possibly need? > 3. I hope that further improvements can be achieved also by the means of > the semantic patch language (Coccinelle software) in safer and more convenient ways. > Are you looking for any extensions according to the coccicheck tool? Sounds good. Submit a patch. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]