From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.linux-watchdog.org (www.linux-watchdog.org [185.87.125.42]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD316282ED; Sun, 30 Jun 2024 09:34:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.87.125.42 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719740060; cv=none; b=M0I7COXcTx8KMlZtXWvBUezRV6BoR9sBzGo+ODsjk7V7nCP1ceat5DDIy8HV54RJmSMQ2EcJSKNN4zb9ONY8bOaflRVd3kF3k6N2qdOJgw2QzuZ4cUd30FJYnFJXhhXGVkK9+6VSqHHqge5L7nqEz0qybIrLOD/xqB2jmpT8rqA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719740060; c=relaxed/simple; bh=k+G8NV2hvavRL0EHhCZYJQFAgauLbWs7Fncj83jaM6I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CsopRjjsMRN/IrUXGaQDfrXjcNvyO0seXC45lGzr0x808oIPcGHxFAPnKwOqDyIWsoU4BT1VperGeGChqN2vN44p2N+xYs5hOaNhx63uRXkDEVtsfJWpC273WWcJ8yq1il5BlCXfRjNdxeEaVu2jor3inARQ/NteS+6v4pp6IUk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=linux-watchdog.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-watchdog.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-watchdog.org header.i=@linux-watchdog.org header.b=b1e/lUSS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.87.125.42 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=linux-watchdog.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-watchdog.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-watchdog.org header.i=@linux-watchdog.org header.b="b1e/lUSS" Received: by www.linux-watchdog.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6C18B40A00; Sun, 30 Jun 2024 11:14:03 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 www.linux-watchdog.org 6C18B40A00 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-watchdog.org; s=odk20180602; t=1719738843; bh=k+G8NV2hvavRL0EHhCZYJQFAgauLbWs7Fncj83jaM6I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=b1e/lUSS9zcUNcbVDGSsvzX1RVsSzOjhsF+M/29s6KnIKBWK0n5JrhHVML3gKF5KL ghBTdwxgp5SCkmZ0vy/Xng+eGW5F8Km3+RgS+d5nvpqibCLrASnfUcRYBtO3FCfsK4 Dgsk8nhwoOr5f1hQT44Koa8CNE69vVJ3JaG+Fh1I= Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 11:14:03 +0200 From: Wim Van Sebroeck To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck , Andrew Morton , LKML , Linux Watchdog Mailing List , Guenter Roeck , Arnd Bergmann , Jeff Johnson Subject: Re: [GIT PULL REQUEST] watchdog - v6.10 release cycle (fixes). Message-ID: <20240630091403.GA12993@www.linux-watchdog.org> References: <20240625133151.GA1554@www.linux-watchdog.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) Hi Linus, > On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 at 06:51, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > > > > git://www.linux-watchdog.org/linux-watchdog.git linux-watchdog-6.10-rc-fixes > > ENOSUCHTAG. > > I do see the commit you mention in HEAD, but there's no actual signed > tag referencing it. > > Forgot to push out (and then didn't react to the error messages that > git request-pull gave you)? It didn't gave me any warnings, so I took time to investigate it this morning. Turns out I did not do it on the linux-watchdog tree but on the linux-watchog-next tree :-( . Such a stupid mistake from my side... I'll fix it and will come back. Kind regards, Wim.