From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B31A6679E5; Mon, 1 Jul 2024 07:08:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719817717; cv=none; b=ocygNR+/VNKQgmDHfaoRdtnELOgKTk1LzvTm2c+a274/Xd4jpK4rpJabHf/OIXp00NSr6kT5zyAayf/V+GFz5//wSUOIWoEJ3E+eJ7EvONwjoMLQWy4EDpgXsvvS7hCwGMIoV20QCp3D0Kmje0MGTPKhPRTtt2lHAirFd377KcI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719817717; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sGfqKARExD4qG9YamTca/kG+4jOu6xK+Q9ajSl11gL4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LorhauZXpeRN2gGi3c+Tppu73GDTqYhuC1/3Mm6n48H4YCuJQAVtH/zlYjG0wijAPg6aCSsaNgeV2v+lpmKLnMpM3QttBpLU+LI256Z9FeVYd1PVwdUYn1v2sVhoCovfYs2A+bDHWonCCQn2ElZwkPVX9mAwUb2I4Q28h9zYi5I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=EKZSo+uf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="EKZSo+uf" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D331BC32781; Mon, 1 Jul 2024 07:08:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1719817717; bh=sGfqKARExD4qG9YamTca/kG+4jOu6xK+Q9ajSl11gL4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=EKZSo+ufCYJ8YwxdpuXQGw2SKjMI0fXRS0y6XHBc2sCvdRCCtnFeA4wB8hYSekeXI hMnS+eIT+tJ6dwRvJOnpPCOn8ylNp6Y8F7/xyAHRhHr1PlYuZ9kni/xtu8wDtNUlSf yPDgHVWlFmzK7Y6Sefo7TwnWDlBVNtXBk4M92VEnPuGt1w5GJDBq2sMVyD+9ON0g4n 70eTnvyVhwMG30nPXtQ6MT6aqhEFBAURGQFgUUM1l2U8jxsI/0oSMRlD0ZZrk3T3ac uzPqZaipt73sk/AbfKjPgxx9OIJiKV6X+2locDimeV0Pv7CViCnKTU4gp6dhC/edM8 X57ZhZAdEswPg== Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 10:08:32 +0300 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Doug Ledford , Jason Gunthorpe , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the mlx5-next tree Message-ID: <20240701070832.GA13195@unreal> References: <20240701153601.50d3f442@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240701153601.50d3f442@canb.auug.org.au> On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 03:36:01PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > The following commit is also in the rdma tree as a different commit > (but the same patch): > > 78a6cbd5145c ("RDMA/mlx5: Use sq timestamp as QP timestamp when RoCE is disabled") > > This is commit > > 0c5275bf75ec ("RDMA/mlx5: Use sq timestamp as QP timestamp when RoCE is disabled") > > in the rdma tree. It is safe to drop the commit from mlx5-next, I dropped it now. Thanks > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell