From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jth@kernel.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] btrfs: don't hold dev_replace rwsem over whole of btrfs_map_block
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 10:13:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240701141320.GI504479@perftesting> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240701-b4-rst-updates-v3-4-e0437e1e04a6@kernel.org>
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 12:25:18PM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> From: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
>
> Don't hold the dev_replace rwsem for the entirety of btrfs_map_block().
>
> It is only needed to protect
> a) calls to find_live_mirror() and
> b) calling into handle_ops_on_dev_replace().
>
> But there is no need to hold the rwsem for any kind of set_io_stripe()
> calls.
>
> So relax taking the dev_replace rwsem to only protect both cases and check
> if the device replace status has changed in the meantime, for which we have
> to re-do the find_live_mirror() calls.
>
> This fixes a deadlock on raid-stripe-tree where device replace performs a
> scrub operation, which in turn calls into btrfs_map_block() to find the
> physical location of the block.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Thanks,
Josef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-01 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-01 10:25 [PATCH v3 0/5] btrfs: rst: updates for RAID stripe tree Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] btrfs: replace stripe extents Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 13:57 ` Josef Bacik
2024-07-01 15:08 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 20:34 ` Josef Bacik
2024-07-01 20:37 ` Josef Bacik
2024-07-02 5:41 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] btrfs: split RAID stripes on deletion Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 14:07 ` Josef Bacik
2024-07-03 15:47 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] btrfs: stripe-tree: add selftests Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 14:08 ` Josef Bacik
2024-07-01 15:09 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] btrfs: don't hold dev_replace rwsem over whole of btrfs_map_block Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 14:13 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2024-07-01 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] btrfs: rst: don't print tree dump in case lookup fails Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 14:12 ` Josef Bacik
2024-07-01 15:03 ` Johannes Thumshirn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240701141320.GI504479@perftesting \
--to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=jth@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox