public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jth@kernel.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] btrfs: don't hold dev_replace rwsem over whole of btrfs_map_block
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 10:13:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240701141320.GI504479@perftesting> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240701-b4-rst-updates-v3-4-e0437e1e04a6@kernel.org>

On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 12:25:18PM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> From: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
> 
> Don't hold the dev_replace rwsem for the entirety of btrfs_map_block().
> 
> It is only needed to protect
> a) calls to find_live_mirror() and
> b) calling into handle_ops_on_dev_replace().
> 
> But there is no need to hold the rwsem for any kind of set_io_stripe()
> calls.
> 
> So relax taking the dev_replace rwsem to only protect both cases and check
> if the device replace status has changed in the meantime, for which we have
> to re-do the find_live_mirror() calls.
> 
> This fixes a deadlock on raid-stripe-tree where device replace performs a
> scrub operation, which in turn calls into btrfs_map_block() to find the
> physical location of the block.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

Thanks,

Josef

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-01 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-01 10:25 [PATCH v3 0/5] btrfs: rst: updates for RAID stripe tree Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] btrfs: replace stripe extents Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 13:57   ` Josef Bacik
2024-07-01 15:08     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 20:34       ` Josef Bacik
2024-07-01 20:37   ` Josef Bacik
2024-07-02  5:41     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] btrfs: split RAID stripes on deletion Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 14:07   ` Josef Bacik
2024-07-03 15:47     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] btrfs: stripe-tree: add selftests Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 14:08   ` Josef Bacik
2024-07-01 15:09     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] btrfs: don't hold dev_replace rwsem over whole of btrfs_map_block Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 14:13   ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2024-07-01 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] btrfs: rst: don't print tree dump in case lookup fails Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 14:12   ` Josef Bacik
2024-07-01 15:03     ` Johannes Thumshirn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240701141320.GI504479@perftesting \
    --to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=jth@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox