public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] dm-verity: hash blocks with shash import+finup when possible
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 17:16:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240702171640.GA1049704@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXFE45J9fDJ9XtMyJiUP1F-odZUmH0zLKkuZeWL_bLdDZQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Ard,

On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 09:41:19AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >  int verity_hash(struct dm_verity *v, struct dm_verity_io *io,
> >                 const u8 *data, size_t len, u8 *digest, bool may_sleep)
> >  {
> > -       struct ahash_request *req = verity_io_hash_req(v, io);
> >         int r;
> > -       struct crypto_wait wait;
> > -
> > -       r = verity_hash_init(v, req, &wait, may_sleep);
> > -       if (unlikely(r < 0))
> > -               goto out;
> >
> > -       r = verity_hash_update(v, req, data, len, &wait);
> > -       if (unlikely(r < 0))
> > -               goto out;
> > +       if (static_branch_unlikely(&ahash_enabled) && !v->shash_tfm) {
> 
> Is the static key really worth the hassle? Couldn't this just be
> 
> if (unlikely(!v->shash_tfm)) {
> 
> so that the ahash logic is moved to the cold path? We need to
> dereference v->shash_tfm right away in any case, and if it is never
> NULL, the branch predictor should be able to remember that.

The value of the static key is indeed marginal.  I included it because of the
precedent of dm-verity's existing use_bh_wq_enabled static key, which exists for
a similar purpose.  As long as we're going through the trouble of doing that, I
think it makes sense to use the same pattern for ahash too.  It's another rarely
needed option that can be patched in in the very rare case that it's needed.

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-02 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-02  6:48 [PATCH 0/7] dm-verity cleanups and optimizations Eric Biggers
2024-07-02  6:48 ` [PATCH 1/7] dm-verity: move hash algorithm setup into its own function Eric Biggers
2024-07-02  6:48 ` [PATCH 2/7] dm-verity: move data hash mismatch handling " Eric Biggers
2024-07-02  6:48 ` [PATCH 3/7] dm-verity: make real_digest and want_digest fixed-length Eric Biggers
2024-07-02  6:48 ` [PATCH 4/7] dm-verity: provide dma_alignment limit in io_hints Eric Biggers
2024-07-02  7:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02  6:48 ` [PATCH 5/7] dm-verity: always "map" the data blocks Eric Biggers
2024-07-02  6:48 ` [PATCH 6/7] dm-verity: make verity_hash() take dm_verity_io instead of ahash_request Eric Biggers
2024-07-02  6:48 ` [PATCH 7/7] dm-verity: hash blocks with shash import+finup when possible Eric Biggers
2024-07-02  7:41   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-07-02 17:16     ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2024-07-03 13:17       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-07-03 19:15 ` [PATCH 0/7] dm-verity cleanups and optimizations Eric Biggers
2024-07-04 15:05   ` Mikulas Patocka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240702171640.GA1049704@google.com \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox