From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FBBA13A416; Fri, 5 Jul 2024 21:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720216035; cv=none; b=i5h4CGUjhVoXmSMr8u1OjY6ak50qL++W4NqYH06R9bkN1zTEXU6P6Q5R58XUkP7v9bSNn8p5Z4qR/9rfihccYlxiQlhmtuJW54lg/x2Y2n8C4GV6dN0kw9ZGt2ThfuHilv9h6IyMSvvVIXepKlC01Gfr6Fh0GY4W6Ipvd4MjIH0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720216035; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DO9YI6U87/AdMasnKM6dLVn1EA/TZFiL2Gbj0GMnUZ4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=naRjHi2m2UN/FwpUvCRPpkgnfqthl9PkjWQvpRFOz5uv5e8d7RpDQgXTW4QwCksEQejeKasLv/yGCZ5Me7YaxSWCo/g7QtnqI7Z3DlPRS6KTP3ibkBAW26rabo19Xe407lg31ug9V6jj2GDdjVHLX2q8GbiDRy0q2InzJkQ5D+k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=muGtsAxj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="muGtsAxj" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1720216032; x=1751752032; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=DO9YI6U87/AdMasnKM6dLVn1EA/TZFiL2Gbj0GMnUZ4=; b=muGtsAxjD/Igzsv+LCo4NmSKZsOQBFuEN/zhBlUgW7htJV0jzxntUk1n ErLXjna8TRyItrOO7220YNMTLsgwhb8BQmc58FE8ylXfqy3sR61BNf5z5 wHiRl2V2l4D2WaDfj8nOPLxYJWI3EESI6VzyASIglba4dtwbPuFQQ4QgP ltgfYCklIA74gyTIWJKtYL7gimXIgCZQUzlM3PEyAGJywHrn+BmUwO4aD 1sdh8Exh5WUwEzQyvL6F+VO+yjPJu0q3uO90HjW3Q/TdrDdAxLZUS3YRa mhqmW+6s/kkw6RQ1QxIu8UoYRqkBnCMv8Vn+WZ+luTurqcZO2HxVg+l3M A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: R1hVL9B+Th2ROvAZOc2gjQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: xPvJ/cayRli9vmG2aQVOPA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11123"; a="40018474" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,186,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="40018474" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Jul 2024 14:47:12 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: aIZrDO3KQ0C9qQiMHrZZJA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: OxqEUSBdR2KL+507Z7R3SA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,186,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="47040794" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 68891e0c336b) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa010.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Jul 2024 14:47:09 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 68891e0c336b with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sPqlm-000Svc-39; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 21:47:06 +0000 Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 05:46:49 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Sunyeal Hong , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Sylwester Nawrocki , Chanwoo Choi , Alim Akhtar , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sunyeal Hong Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] clk: samsung: add top clock support for Exynos Auto v920 SoC Message-ID: <202407060546.Zqh1m0PR-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240705021110.2495344-6-sunyeal.hong@samsung.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240705021110.2495344-6-sunyeal.hong@samsung.com> Hi Sunyeal, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on krzk/for-next] [also build test WARNING on pinctrl-samsung/for-next krzk-dt/for-next linus/master v6.10-rc6 next-20240703] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sunyeal-Hong/dt-bindings-clock-add-Exynos-Auto-v920-SoC-CMU-bindings/20240705-195227 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240705021110.2495344-6-sunyeal.hong%40samsung.com patch subject: [PATCH 5/5] clk: samsung: add top clock support for Exynos Auto v920 SoC config: arm64-randconfig-003-20240706 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240706/202407060546.Zqh1m0PR-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 16.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 7cbf1a2591520c2491aa35339f227775f4d3adf6) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240706/202407060546.Zqh1m0PR-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202407060546.Zqh1m0PR-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynosautov920.c:1131:40: warning: unused variable 'peric0_gate_clks' [-Wunused-const-variable] static const struct samsung_gate_clock peric0_gate_clks[] __initconst = { ^ 1 warning generated. vim +/peric0_gate_clks +1131 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynosautov920.c 1130 > 1131 static const struct samsung_gate_clock peric0_gate_clks[] __initconst = { 1132 }; 1133 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki