From: Lizhe <sensor1010@163.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lizhe <sensor1010@163.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] driver:core: no need to invert the return value of the call_driver_probe()
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 06:40:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240708134028.3508-1-sensor1010@163.com> (raw)
If drv->probe() or drv->bus->probe() returns EPROBE_DEFER,
then there is no need to invert the sign. Similarly,
if it returns -EPROBE_DEFER, no sign inversion is needed either
In the probe function (either bus->probe() or drv->probe()),
there is no return value of EPROBE_DEFER.
v2:
Delete the judgment with the return value of EPROBEDEFER
from the _driver_probe.device()
v1:
Add the judgment with the return value of EPROBEDEFER
from the _driver_probe.device()
Signed-off-by: Lizhe <sensor1010@163.com>
---
drivers/base/dd.c | 7 +------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
index 83d352394fdf..d047919d1f5e 100644
--- a/drivers/base/dd.c
+++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
@@ -664,11 +664,6 @@ static int really_probe(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
if (link_ret == -EAGAIN)
ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
- /*
- * Return probe errors as positive values so that the callers
- * can distinguish them from other errors.
- */
- ret = -ret;
goto probe_failed;
}
@@ -826,7 +821,7 @@ static int driver_probe_device(struct device_driver *drv, struct device *dev)
atomic_inc(&probe_count);
ret = __driver_probe_device(drv, dev);
- if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER || ret == EPROBE_DEFER) {
+ if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
driver_deferred_probe_add(dev);
/*
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-07-08 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-08 13:40 Lizhe [this message]
2024-07-08 13:57 ` [PATCH v2] driver:core: no need to invert the return value of the call_driver_probe() Greg KH
[not found] ` <38a8f6da.ae7e.19097de3e54.Coremail.sensor1010@163.com>
2024-07-09 14:26 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240708134028.3508-1-sensor1010@163.com \
--to=sensor1010@163.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox