From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
liujinlong <liujinlong@kylinos.cn>,
liujinlong <mingliu6104@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kspp tree with Linus' tree
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 08:55:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202407090855.2CA07B977F@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df14f286-a00c-493d-9abd-83d42dd6b6b2@app.fastmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 10:29:19AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2024, at 09:58, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the kspp tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > kernel/kallsyms.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 7e1f4eb9a60d ("kallsyms: rework symbol lookup return codes")
> >
> > from Linus' tree and commit:
> >
> > 21b4564fedad ("sprint_symbol: Replace strcpy with memmove to handle
> > potential overlap")
> >
> > from the kspp tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (the former removed the code modified by the latter, so I
> > did that) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as
> > linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned
> > to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.
> > You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the
> > conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Thanks for pointing this out. It does look like the second
> patch also just tries to address the same warning that I
> fixed in my larger patch.
>
> Kees, do you want to just drop that patch from your tree?
Yup! Done. Thanks for the larger fix! :)
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-09 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-09 7:58 linux-next: manual merge of the kspp tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-07-09 8:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-09 15:55 ` Kees Cook [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-15 10:49 Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-14 4:04 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-11 6:17 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-09 6:41 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-29 5:43 Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-08 2:00 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-06 4:48 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-08 1:41 Stephen Rothwell
2016-11-08 2:31 Stephen Rothwell
2016-11-08 18:44 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202407090855.2CA07B977F@keescook \
--to=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liujinlong@kylinos.cn \
--cc=mingliu6104@gmail.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).