* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review
2024-07-09 11:08 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-07-09 18:42 ` SeongJae Park
2024-07-09 19:58 ` Kelsey Steele
` (12 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2024-07-09 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: SeongJae Park, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, damon
Hello,
On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 13:08:20 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.39 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.39-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below. Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].
Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
[1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] 3be0ca2a17a0 ("Linux 6.6.39-rc1")
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
---
ok 1 selftests: damon: debugfs_attrs.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon: debugfs_schemes.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon: debugfs_empty_targets.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon: debugfs_huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon: debugfs_duplicate_context_creation.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon: debugfs_rm_non_contexts.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon: sysfs.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon: sysfs_update_removed_scheme_dir.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon: reclaim.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon: lru_sort.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_m68k.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
[33m
[92mPASS [39m
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review
2024-07-09 11:08 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-07-09 18:42 ` SeongJae Park
@ 2024-07-09 19:58 ` Kelsey Steele
2024-07-09 21:35 ` Peter Schneider
` (11 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Kelsey Steele @ 2024-07-09 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 01:08:20PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.39 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
No regressions found on WSL (x86 and arm64).
Built, booted, and reviewed dmesg.
Thank you. :)
Tested-by: Kelsey Steele <kelseysteele@linux.microsoft.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review
2024-07-09 11:08 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-07-09 18:42 ` SeongJae Park
2024-07-09 19:58 ` Kelsey Steele
@ 2024-07-09 21:35 ` Peter Schneider
2024-07-09 21:37 ` Mark Brown
` (10 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Peter Schneider @ 2024-07-09 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
Am 09.07.2024 um 13:08 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.39 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Builds, boots and works on my 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon E5-2697 v2 server. No dmesg
oddities or regressions found. It ran for an hour now, and I built 6.9.9-rc1
with it, which I will boot-test next.
Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>
Beste Grüße,
Peter Schneider
--
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you. -- David McCullough Jr.
OpenPGP: 0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@googlemail.com
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review
2024-07-09 11:08 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-07-09 21:35 ` Peter Schneider
@ 2024-07-09 21:37 ` Mark Brown
2024-07-09 23:23 ` Shuah Khan
` (9 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2024-07-09 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 01:08:20PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.39 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review
2024-07-09 11:08 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-07-09 21:37 ` Mark Brown
@ 2024-07-09 23:23 ` Shuah Khan
2024-07-10 8:34 ` Jon Hunter
` (8 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-07-09 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, Shuah Khan
On 7/9/24 05:08, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.39 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.39-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review
2024-07-09 11:08 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-07-09 23:23 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2024-07-10 8:34 ` Jon Hunter
2024-07-10 9:21 ` Shreeya Patel
` (7 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-07-10 8:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Tue, 09 Jul 2024 13:08:20 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.39 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.39-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.6:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 116 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.6.39-rc1-g3be0ca2a17a0
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review
2024-07-09 11:08 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-07-10 8:34 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-07-10 9:21 ` Shreeya Patel
2024-07-10 11:06 ` Pascal Ernster
` (6 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Shreeya Patel @ 2024-07-10 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
kernelci-regressions mailing list
On Tuesday, July 09, 2024 16:38 IST, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.39 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.39-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
KernelCI report for stable-rc/linux-6.6.y for this week :-
Date: 2024-07-10
## Build failures:
No **new** boot failures seen for the stable-rc/linux-6.6.y commit head \o/
Tested-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org>
Thanks,
Shreeya Patel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review
2024-07-09 11:08 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-07-10 9:21 ` Shreeya Patel
@ 2024-07-10 11:06 ` Pascal Ernster
2024-07-10 11:28 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
` (5 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Pascal Ernster @ 2024-07-10 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
[2024-07-09 13:08] Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.39 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.39-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi, 6.6.39-rc1 is running fine on both an x86_64 Haswell VM and a
TP-Link Archer C7 v4 (the SoC is a Qualcomm Atheros QCA9563, which has a
74Kc MIPS core).
Tested-by: Pascal Ernster <git@hardfalcon.net>
Regards
Pascal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review
2024-07-09 11:08 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-07-10 11:06 ` Pascal Ernster
@ 2024-07-10 11:28 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2024-07-10 12:30 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (4 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Harshit Mogalapalli @ 2024-07-10 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, Vegard Nossum, Darren Kenny
Hi Greg,
On 09/07/24 16:38, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.39 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
No problems seen on x86_64 and aarch64 with our testing.
Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Thanks,
Harshit
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.39-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review
2024-07-09 11:08 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2024-07-10 11:28 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
@ 2024-07-10 12:30 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-07-10 13:03 ` Ron Economos
` (3 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-07-10 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 at 16:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.39 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.39-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
NOTES:
1) The Powerpc build regressions reported and bisected [1]
Email thread link,
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYvcbdKN8B9t-ukO2aZCOwkjNme8+XhLcL-=wcd+XXRP6g@mail.gmail.com/
2) The new Build warnings noticed on arm64 [2]
arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: In function 'bpf_int_jit_compile':
arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:1651:17: warning: ignoring return value
of 'bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro' declared with attribute
'warn_unused_result' [-Wunused-result]
1651 | bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro(header);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
## Build
* kernel: 6.6.37-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: ca32fab2f2f9ffc305606cc41fe02e41bce06dd6
* git describe: v6.6.36-164-gca32fab2f2f9
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.36-164-gca32fab2f2f9
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.6.38-140-g3be0ca2a17a0)
* powerpc, build
- clang-18-defconfig
- clang-nightly-defconfig
- gcc-13-defconfig
- gcc-8-defconfig
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.6.38-140-g3be0ca2a17a0)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.6.38-140-g3be0ca2a17a0)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.6.38-140-g3be0ca2a17a0)
## Test result summary
total: 256613, pass: 222330, fail: 3270, skip: 30550, xfail: 463
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 127 total, 127 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 34 total, 30 passed, 4 failed
* riscv: 17 total, 17 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 31 total, 31 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-smoketest
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review
2024-07-09 11:08 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2024-07-10 12:30 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-07-10 13:03 ` Ron Economos
2024-07-10 13:36 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
` (2 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2024-07-10 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 7/9/24 4:08 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.39 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.39-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review
2024-07-09 11:08 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2024-07-10 13:03 ` Ron Economos
@ 2024-07-10 13:36 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
2024-07-10 14:11 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-07-12 17:26 ` Florian Fainelli
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Takeshi Ogasawara @ 2024-07-10 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
Hi Greg
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 8:12 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.39 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.39-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
6.6.39-rc1 tested.
Build successfully completed.
Boot successfully completed.
No dmesg regressions.
Video output normal.
Sound output normal.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen10(Intel i7-1260P(x86_64) arch linux)
[ 0.000000] Linux version 6.6.39-rc1rv
(takeshi@ThinkPadX1Gen10J0764) (gcc (GCC) 14.1.1 20240522, GNU ld (GNU
Binutils) 2.42.0) #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed Jul 10 21:13:34 JST 2024
Thanks
Tested-by: Takeshi Ogasawara <takeshi.ogasawara@futuring-girl.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review
2024-07-09 11:08 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2024-07-10 13:36 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
@ 2024-07-10 14:11 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-07-12 17:26 ` Florian Fainelli
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-07-10 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 at 16:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.39 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.39-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
[Please ignore older version report email]
[Here is the latest one]
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
We have two major regressions.
1)
As I have reported on 6.9.9-rc1 the same kernel panic was noticed while
running kunit tests [1] seen on 6.6.39-rc1.
BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xa4/0x158
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYsqkB4=pVZyELyj3YqUc9jXFfgNULsPk9t8q-+P1w_G6A@mail.gmail.com/
2)
s390 build regressions [2]:
--------
arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:311:11: error: expected ';' at end
of declaration
311 | psw_t psw __uninitialized;
| ^
| ;
[2] https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2j0Y8vJ0DjSyCxUFw4CFk1yTq9S/
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 6.6.39-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 3be0ca2a17a0142c600526e9ec5676d797ad213e
* git describe: v6.6.38-140-g3be0ca2a17a0
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.38-140-g3be0ca2a17a0
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.6.35-193-g580e509ea134)
* qemu-armv5, boot
- clang-18-multi_v5_defconfig-kunit
- clang-nightly-multi_v5_defconfig-kunit
- gcc-13-multi_v5_defconfig-kunit
* qemu-i386, boot
- gcc-13-lkftconfig-kunit
* s390, build
- clang-18-allnoconfig
- clang-18-defconfig
- clang-18-tinyconfig
- clang-nightly-allnoconfig
- clang-nightly-defconfig
- clang-nightly-tinyconfig
- gcc-13-allnoconfig
- gcc-13-defconfig
- gcc-13-tinyconfig
- gcc-8-allnoconfig
- gcc-8-defconfig-fe40093d
- gcc-8-tinyconfig
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.6.35-193-g580e509ea134)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.6.35-193-g580e509ea134)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.6.35-193-g580e509ea134)
## Test result summary
total: 249497, pass: 213701, fail: 5004, skip: 30287, xfail: 505
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 127 total, 127 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 17 total, 17 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 0 passed, 12 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 31 total, 31 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-smoketest
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review
2024-07-09 11:08 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2024-07-10 14:11 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-07-12 17:26 ` Florian Fainelli
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-07-12 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 7/9/24 04:08, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.39 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.39-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread