public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Stewart Hildebrand <stewart.hildebrand@amd.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] x86: PCI: preserve IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN alignment
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 11:19:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240709161936.GA175713@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240709133610.1089420-5-stewart.hildebrand@amd.com>

On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 09:36:01AM -0400, Stewart Hildebrand wrote:
> Currently, it's not possible to use the IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN flag on
> x86 due to the alignment being overwritten in
> pcibios_allocate_dev_resources(). Make one small change in arch/x86 to
> make it work on x86.

Is this a regression?  I didn't look up when IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN was
added, but likely it was for some situation on x86, so presumably it
worked at one time.  If something broke it in the meantime, it would
be nice to identify the commit that broke it.

Nit: follow the subject line conventions for this and the other
patches.  Learn them with "git log --oneline".  For this patch,
"x86/PCI: <Capitalized text>" is appropriate.

> Signed-off-by: Stewart Hildebrand <stewart.hildebrand@amd.com>
> ---
> RFC: We don't have enough info in this function to re-calculate the
>      alignment value in case of IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN. Luckily our
>      alignment value seems to be intact, so just don't touch it...
>      Alternatively, we could call pci_reassigndev_resource_alignment()
>      after the loop. Would that be preferable?
> ---
>  arch/x86/pci/i386.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
> index f2f4a5d50b27..ff6e61389ec7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
> @@ -283,8 +283,11 @@ static void pcibios_allocate_dev_resources(struct pci_dev *dev, int pass)
>  						/* We'll assign a new address later */
>  						pcibios_save_fw_addr(dev,
>  								idx, r->start);
> -						r->end -= r->start;
> -						r->start = 0;
> +						if (!(r->flags &
> +						      IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN)) {
> +							r->end -= r->start;
> +							r->start = 0;
> +						}
>  					}
>  				}
>  			}
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-09 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-09 13:35 [PATCH 0/6] PCI: align small (<4k) BARs Stewart Hildebrand
2024-07-09 13:35 ` [PATCH 1/6] PCI: don't clear already cleared bit Stewart Hildebrand
2024-07-09 13:35 ` [PATCH 2/6] PCI: restore resource alignment Stewart Hildebrand
2024-07-09 13:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] PCI: restore memory decoding after reallocation Stewart Hildebrand
2024-07-09 16:16   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-07-10 20:31     ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-07-09 13:36 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] x86: PCI: preserve IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN alignment Stewart Hildebrand
2024-07-09 16:19   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2024-07-10 16:16     ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-07-10 21:24       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-07-10 22:49         ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-07-11 18:40           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-07-11 18:58             ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-07-11 20:35               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-07-15 17:26         ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-07-10 14:05   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-07-15 17:30     ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-07-09 13:36 ` [PATCH 5/6] PCI: don't reassign resources that are already aligned Stewart Hildebrand
2024-07-09 13:36 ` [PATCH 6/6] PCI: align small (<4k) BARs Stewart Hildebrand
2024-07-09 16:21   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-07-10 16:35     ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-07-10 13:56   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-07-10 16:28     ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-07-10 23:26 ` [PATCH 0/6] " Stewart Hildebrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240709161936.GA175713@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=stewart.hildebrand@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox