From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
schatzberg.dan@gmail.com, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
changwoo@igalia.com, righi.andrea@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched_ext: Allow SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON for direct dispatches
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 21:05:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240711020541.GH317151@maniforge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240711011434.1421572-6-tj@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2013 bytes --]
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 03:14:02PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> In ops.dispatch(), SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON can be used to dispatch the task to the
> local DSQ of any CPU. However, during direct dispatch from ops.select_cpu()
> and ops.enqueue(), this isn't allowed. This is because dispatching to the
> local DSQ of a remote CPU requires locking both the task's current and new
> rq's and such double locking can't be done directly from ops.enqueue().
>
> While waking up a task, as ops.select_cpu() can pick any CPU and both
> ops.select_cpu() and ops.enqueue() can use SCX_DSQ_LOCAL as the dispatch
> target to dispatch to the DSQ of the picked CPU, the BPF scheduler can still
> do whatever it wants to do. However, while a task is being enqueued for a
> different reason, e.g. after its slice expiration, only ops.enqueue() is
> called and there's no way for the BPF scheduler to directly dispatch to the
> local DSQ of a remote CPU. This gap in API forces schedulers into
> work-arounds which are not straightforward or optimal such as skipping
> direct dispatches in such cases.
>
> Implement deferred enqueueing to allow directly dispatching to the local DSQ
> of a remote CPU from ops.select_cpu() and ops.enqueue(). Such tasks are
> temporarily queued on rq->scx.ddsp_deferred_locals. When the rq lock can be
> safely released, the tasks are taken off the list and queued on the target
> local DSQs using dispatch_to_local_dsq().
>
> v2: - Add missing return after queue_balance_callback() in
> schedule_deferred(). (David).
>
> - dispatch_to_local_dsq() now assumes that @rq is locked but unpinned
> and thus no longer takes @rf. Updated accordingly.
>
> - UP build warning fix.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Tested-by: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com>
> Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
> Cc: Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@gmail.com>
> Cc: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-11 2:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-11 1:13 [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-6.11] sched_ext: Allow SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON for direct dispatches Tejun Heo
2024-07-11 1:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] sched: Move struct balance_callback definition upward Tejun Heo
2024-07-11 21:06 ` Tejun Heo
2024-07-11 1:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched_ext: Open-code task_linked_on_dsq() Tejun Heo
2024-07-11 1:14 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched_ext: Unpin and repin rq lock from balance_scx() Tejun Heo
2024-07-11 2:05 ` David Vernet
2024-07-11 1:14 ` [PATCH 4/6] sched_ext: s/SCX_RQ_BALANCING/SCX_RQ_IN_BALANCE/ and add SCX_RQ_IN_WAKEUP Tejun Heo
2024-07-11 1:14 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched_ext: Allow SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON for direct dispatches Tejun Heo
2024-07-11 2:05 ` David Vernet [this message]
2024-07-11 1:14 ` [PATCH 6/6] sched_ext/scx_qmap: Pick idle CPU for direct dispatch on !wakeup enqueues Tejun Heo
2024-07-12 18:22 ` [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-6.11] sched_ext: Allow SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON for direct dispatches Tejun Heo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-07-09 21:21 [PATCHSET " Tejun Heo
2024-07-09 21:21 ` [PATCH 5/6] " Tejun Heo
2024-07-10 18:51 ` David Vernet
2024-07-10 23:43 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240711020541.GH317151@maniforge \
--to=void@manifault.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=schatzberg.dan@gmail.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox