From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iommufd: Add check on user response code
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 20:39:50 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240711233950.GU14050@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240710083341.44617-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 04:33:40PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> The response code from user space is only allowed to be SUCCESS or
> INVALID. All other values are treated by the device as a response
> code of Response Failure according to PCI spec, section 10.4.2.1.
> This response disables the Page Request Interface for the Function.
>
> Add a check in iommufd_fault_fops_write() to avoid invalid response
> code.
>
> Fixes: 07838f7fd529 ("iommufd: Add iommufd fault object")
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/iommufd/fault.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/fault.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/fault.c
> index 54d6cd20a673..044b9b97da31 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/fault.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/fault.c
> @@ -305,6 +305,12 @@ static ssize_t iommufd_fault_fops_write(struct file *filep, const char __user *b
> if (rc)
> break;
>
> + if (response.code != IOMMUFD_PAGE_RESP_SUCCESS &&
> + response.code != IOMMUFD_PAGE_RESP_INVALID) {
> + rc = -EINVAL;
> + break;
> + }
I added this:
static_assert(IOMMUFD_PAGE_RESP_SUCCESS ==
IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_SUCCESS);
static_assert(IOMMUFD_PAGE_RESP_INVALID ==
IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_INVALID);
As well
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-11 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-10 8:33 [PATCH 0/3] iommufd: Avoid PRI Response Failure Lu Baolu
2024-07-10 8:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] iommufd: Remove IOMMUFD_PAGE_RESP_FAILURE Lu Baolu
2024-07-10 9:45 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-07-10 8:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] iommufd: Add check on user response code Lu Baolu
2024-07-10 9:47 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-07-11 23:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2024-07-12 2:54 ` Baolu Lu
2024-07-12 12:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-07-10 8:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] iommu: Convert response code from failure to invalid Lu Baolu
2024-07-10 9:56 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-07-11 4:42 ` Baolu Lu
2024-07-11 23:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-07-11 23:45 ` [PATCH 0/3] iommufd: Avoid PRI Response Failure Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240711233950.GU14050@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox