public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iommufd: Add check on user response code
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 20:39:50 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240711233950.GU14050@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240710083341.44617-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 04:33:40PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> The response code from user space is only allowed to be SUCCESS or
> INVALID. All other values are treated by the device as a response
> code of Response Failure according to PCI spec, section 10.4.2.1.
> This response disables the Page Request Interface for the Function.
> 
> Add a check in iommufd_fault_fops_write() to avoid invalid response
> code.
> 
> Fixes: 07838f7fd529 ("iommufd: Add iommufd fault object")
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/iommufd/fault.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/fault.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/fault.c
> index 54d6cd20a673..044b9b97da31 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/fault.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/fault.c
> @@ -305,6 +305,12 @@ static ssize_t iommufd_fault_fops_write(struct file *filep, const char __user *b
>  		if (rc)
>  			break;
>  
> +		if (response.code != IOMMUFD_PAGE_RESP_SUCCESS &&
> +		    response.code != IOMMUFD_PAGE_RESP_INVALID) {
> +			rc = -EINVAL;
> +			break;
> +		}


I added this:

		static_assert(IOMMUFD_PAGE_RESP_SUCCESS ==
			      IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_SUCCESS);
		static_assert(IOMMUFD_PAGE_RESP_INVALID ==
			      IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_INVALID);

As well

Jason

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-11 23:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-10  8:33 [PATCH 0/3] iommufd: Avoid PRI Response Failure Lu Baolu
2024-07-10  8:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] iommufd: Remove IOMMUFD_PAGE_RESP_FAILURE Lu Baolu
2024-07-10  9:45   ` Tian, Kevin
2024-07-10  8:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] iommufd: Add check on user response code Lu Baolu
2024-07-10  9:47   ` Tian, Kevin
2024-07-11 23:39   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2024-07-12  2:54     ` Baolu Lu
2024-07-12 12:43       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-07-10  8:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] iommu: Convert response code from failure to invalid Lu Baolu
2024-07-10  9:56   ` Tian, Kevin
2024-07-11  4:42     ` Baolu Lu
2024-07-11 23:37     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-07-11 23:45 ` [PATCH 0/3] iommufd: Avoid PRI Response Failure Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240711233950.GU14050@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox