public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
	Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
	Tomas Glozar <tglozar@redhat.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 02/10] irq_work: Split type definition to its own header
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 17:17:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240712151732.GQ27299@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240711130004.2157737-3-vschneid@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 02:59:56PM +0200, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> A later commit will add a struct irq_work member to struct task_struct, which
> would require <linux/sched.h> to include the definition of struct
> irq_work.
> 
> Thanks to header dependency hell, incudling <linux/irq_work.h> in <linux/sched.h>
> results in defining inline helpers using not-yet-defined fields (mm_struct,
> task_struct, various task states...).
> 
> Break off the definition of struct irq_work into its own header file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/irq_work.h       |  8 ++------
>  include/linux/irq_work_types.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/irq_work_types.h
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/irq_work.h b/include/linux/irq_work.h
> index 136f2980cba30..7f6d2af360d91 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irq_work.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irq_work.h
> @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
>  #include <linux/smp_types.h>
>  #include <linux/rcuwait.h>
>  
> +#include <linux/irq_work_types.h>
> +
>  /*
>   * An entry can be in one of four states:
>   *
> @@ -14,12 +16,6 @@
>   * busy      NULL, 2 -> {free, claimed} : callback in progress, can be claimed
>   */
>  
> -struct irq_work {
> -	struct __call_single_node node;
> -	void (*func)(struct irq_work *);
> -	struct rcuwait irqwait;
> -};
> -
>  #define __IRQ_WORK_INIT(_func, _flags) (struct irq_work){	\
>  	.node = { .u_flags = (_flags), },			\
>  	.func = (_func),					\
> diff --git a/include/linux/irq_work_types.h b/include/linux/irq_work_types.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..108cbc514733b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/irq_work_types.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef _LINUX_IRQ_WORK_TYPES_H
> +#define _LINUX_IRQ_WORK_TYPES_H
> +
> +#include <linux/smp_types.h>
> +#include <linux/rcuwait_types.h>
> +
> +struct irq_work {
> +	struct __call_single_node node;
> +	void (*func)(struct irq_work *);
> +	struct rcuwait irqwait;
> +};
> +
> +#endif

Since smp_types.h already mentions IRQ_WORK, given how I tangled the
whole things together, should we just put this struct there as well?

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-12 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-11 12:59 [RFC PATCH v3 00/10] sched/fair: Defer CFS throttle to user entry Valentin Schneider
2024-07-11 12:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/10] rcuwait: Split type definition to its own header Valentin Schneider
2024-07-12 15:15   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-07-15 17:57     ` Valentin Schneider
2024-07-11 12:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/10] irq_work: " Valentin Schneider
2024-07-12 15:17   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2024-07-11 12:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/10] task_work, sched: Add a _locked variant to task_work_cancel() Valentin Schneider
2024-07-12 10:35   ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-07-12 15:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-07-15 17:57     ` Valentin Schneider
2024-07-11 12:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/10] sched/fair: Introduce sched_throttle_work Valentin Schneider
2024-07-12 15:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-07-15 17:58     ` Valentin Schneider
2024-07-11 12:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/10] sched/fair: Introduce an irq_work for cancelling throttle task_work Valentin Schneider
2024-07-11 13:00 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/10] sched/fair: Prepare switched_from & switched_to for per-task throttling Valentin Schneider
2024-07-12 15:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-07-11 13:00 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/10] sched/fair: Prepare task_change_group_fair() " Valentin Schneider
2024-07-11 13:00 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/10] sched/fair: Prepare migrate_task_rq_fair() " Valentin Schneider
2024-07-11 13:00 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/10] sched/fair: Add a class->task_woken callback in preparation " Valentin Schneider
2024-07-11 13:00 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/10] sched/fair: Throttle CFS tasks on return to userspace Valentin Schneider
2024-07-12 17:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-07-12 17:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-07-12 17:43   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-07-16 12:46     ` Valentin Schneider
2024-07-19  0:25   ` Benjamin Segall
2024-07-23 15:16     ` Valentin Schneider
2024-07-24  1:34       ` Benjamin Segall
2024-07-24  7:20         ` Valentin Schneider

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240712151732.GQ27299@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglozar@redhat.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox