Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/284] 5.10.221-rc2 review

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 12:56:44PM +0200, Frank Scheiner wrote:
> Dear Greg, dear Sasha,
> 
> I noticed a build failure for linux-5.10.y for ia64 ([1]) (sorry,
> actually since 5.10.221-rc1, but I didn't notice that build failure
> before yesterday :-/ and as the review window for 5.10.222-rc1 is not
> yet open, I thought I send it now as response to the last review window
> announcement for 5.10.221-rc2):
> 
> https://github.com/linux-ia64/linux-stable-rc/actions/runs/9771252437/job/26974019958#step:8:3524:
> ```
> [...]
> CC [M]  drivers/pps/pps.o
> drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c:16:10: fatal error: asm/efi.h: No such
> file or directory
>    16 | #include <asm/efi.h>
>       |          ^~~~~~~~~~~
> compilation terminated.
> [...]
> ```
> 
> [1]:
> https://github.com/linux-ia64/linux-stable-rc/actions/runs/9771252437#summary-26974019958
> 
> This is related to the recent addition of this change set:
> 
> efi: memmap: Move manipulation routines into x86 arch tree
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/commit/?h=linux-5.10.y&id=31e0721aeabde29371f624f56ce2f403508527a5
> 
> ...to linux-5.10.y. For ia64 this change set on its own seems incomplete
> as it requires a header not available for ia64 w/o additional changes.
> 
> Adding:
> 
> efi: ia64: move IA64-only declarations to new asm/efi.h header
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8ff059b8531f3b98e14f0461859fc7cdd95823e4
> 
> ...or from here (according to GitHub this is in linux-stable(-rc)
> starting with linux-5.12.y):
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=8ff059b8531f3b98e14f0461859fc7cdd95823e4
> 
> fixes it for me with 5.10.222-rc1, see for example [2].
> 
> [2]:
> https://github.com/linux-ia64/linux-stable-rc/actions/runs/9871144965#summary-27258970494

I'm confused, which commit should we add, or should we just revert what
we have now?

And I thought that ia64 was dead?

thanks,

greg k-h