From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, seanjc@google.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, ravi.bangoria@amd.com,
hpa@zytor.com, rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk, peterz@infradead.org,
james.morse@arm.com, lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com,
arjan@linux.intel.com, j.granados@samsung.com,
sibs@chinatelecom.cn, nik.borisov@suse.com, michael.roth@amd.com,
nikunj.dadhania@amd.com, babu.moger@amd.com, x86@kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
santosh.shukla@amd.com, ananth.narayan@amd.com,
sandipan.das@amd.com, manali.shukla@amd.com, jmattson@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] x86/split_lock: Move Split and Bus lock code to a dedicated file
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 20:41:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202407132059.uppmW6rR-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240712093943.1288-2-ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Hi Ravi,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on tip/master]
[also build test ERROR on next-20240712]
[cannot apply to tip/x86/core kvm/queue linus/master tip/auto-latest kvm/linux-next v6.10-rc7]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ravi-Bangoria/x86-split_lock-Move-Split-and-Bus-lock-code-to-a-dedicated-file/20240712-175306
base: tip/master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240712093943.1288-2-ravi.bangoria%40amd.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] x86/split_lock: Move Split and Bus lock code to a dedicated file
config: i386-randconfig-015-20240713 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240713/202407132059.uppmW6rR-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Ubuntu 11.4.0-4ubuntu1) 11.4.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240713/202407132059.uppmW6rR-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202407132059.uppmW6rR-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bus_lock.c: In function 'split_lock_warn':
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bus_lock.c:219:21: error: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'reported_split_lock'
219 | if (!current->reported_split_lock)
| ^~
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bus_lock.c:222:16: error: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'reported_split_lock'
222 | current->reported_split_lock = 1;
| ^~
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bus_lock.c: At top level:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bus_lock.c:250:6: error: redefinition of 'handle_guest_split_lock'
250 | bool handle_guest_split_lock(unsigned long ip)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bus_lock.c:12:
arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h:42:20: note: previous definition of 'handle_guest_split_lock' with type 'bool(long unsigned int)' {aka '_Bool(long unsigned int)'}
42 | static inline bool handle_guest_split_lock(unsigned long ip)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bus_lock.c:292:6: error: redefinition of 'handle_user_split_lock'
292 | bool handle_user_split_lock(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bus_lock.c:12:
arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h:37:20: note: previous definition of 'handle_user_split_lock' with type 'bool(struct pt_regs *, long int)' {aka '_Bool(struct pt_regs *, long int)'}
37 | static inline bool handle_user_split_lock(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bus_lock.c:300:6: error: redefinition of 'handle_bus_lock'
300 | void handle_bus_lock(struct pt_regs *regs)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bus_lock.c:12:
arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h:47:20: note: previous definition of 'handle_bus_lock' with type 'void(struct pt_regs *)'
47 | static inline void handle_bus_lock(struct pt_regs *regs) {}
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bus_lock.c:401:13: error: redefinition of 'sld_setup'
401 | void __init sld_setup(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
| ^~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bus_lock.c:12:
arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h:36:27: note: previous definition of 'sld_setup' with type 'void(struct cpuinfo_x86 *)'
36 | static inline void __init sld_setup(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) {}
| ^~~~~~~~~
vim +219 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bus_lock.c
213
214 static void split_lock_warn(unsigned long ip)
215 {
216 struct delayed_work *work;
217 int cpu;
218
> 219 if (!current->reported_split_lock)
220 pr_warn_ratelimited("#AC: %s/%d took a split_lock trap at address: 0x%lx\n",
221 current->comm, current->pid, ip);
222 current->reported_split_lock = 1;
223
224 if (sysctl_sld_mitigate) {
225 /*
226 * misery factor #1:
227 * sleep 10ms before trying to execute split lock.
228 */
229 if (msleep_interruptible(10) > 0)
230 return;
231 /*
232 * Misery factor #2:
233 * only allow one buslocked disabled core at a time.
234 */
235 if (down_interruptible(&buslock_sem) == -EINTR)
236 return;
237 work = &sl_reenable_unlock;
238 } else {
239 work = &sl_reenable;
240 }
241
242 cpu = get_cpu();
243 schedule_delayed_work_on(cpu, work, 2);
244
245 /* Disable split lock detection on this CPU to make progress */
246 sld_update_msr(false);
247 put_cpu();
248 }
249
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-13 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-12 9:39 [PATCH v2 0/4] x86/cpu: Add Bus Lock Detect support for AMD Ravi Bangoria
2024-07-12 9:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] x86/split_lock: Move Split and Bus lock code to a dedicated file Ravi Bangoria
2024-07-13 10:33 ` kernel test robot
2024-07-13 12:41 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-07-12 9:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] x86/bus_lock: Add support for AMD Ravi Bangoria
2024-07-12 9:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: SVM: Don't advertise Bus Lock Detect to guest if SVM support is missing Ravi Bangoria
2024-07-12 23:33 ` Jim Mattson
2024-07-12 9:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: SVM: Add Bus Lock Detect support Ravi Bangoria
2024-07-15 15:11 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] x86/cpu: Add Bus Lock Detect support for AMD Tom Lendacky
2024-07-15 15:18 ` Ravi Bangoria
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202407132059.uppmW6rR-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=j.granados@samsung.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
--cc=manali.shukla@amd.com \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=nikunj.dadhania@amd.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sibs@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox