From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EA481850B3; Mon, 15 Jul 2024 11:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721043804; cv=none; b=hcmgL73IQT/8L+McKbHXwXuRqIXi8JRXc072otTrF2LID5KMSbV/VaFAZnym83PHsS2MMSTS7oBGoGZA7CfOh/BKohlevHG7Zo7fa5PHWbEE0yYW8SuN4gzbSvBO+F9oLJ8FyAfGYxSOoWmxbv4Zm8/ISXLZmXBaVtLKQhyVa80= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721043804; c=relaxed/simple; bh=e+MHyCyj9h3QpDGIY8dzDG9OfbTUY49n9aY53EdlVcQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=G+8vtFqSCL3ZwiptAS6wLwfJ94ediuKGrOPMP8rGusQmucj/127BQN9nnC7qr6XGeb61WNCKnnAoRlQAthhGxsGo/jzFK5YonymSUaSWxJphR22hbgyLr4uc2J0DDbb1L58WyKMEaYcJk9tyyBir4HKcWwRx0S5b5I3Kw8IJsvo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=kqZjWEou; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="kqZjWEou" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 215E3C32782; Mon, 15 Jul 2024 11:43:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1721043803; bh=e+MHyCyj9h3QpDGIY8dzDG9OfbTUY49n9aY53EdlVcQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=kqZjWEou3Q+C80oY1OIuC4gm2F89DW85dO8PZAuWwzIEKgyFpECOp1YKP0tqcErMW c782+I5icTMl0TRNv4i7iXo3tmrnwmqV6MbNI7iI0Twz6Qajel82rtVJHbcPTVjgLp 61pyQLhRHzuEdfxCtRGihfjAH/qRs0NzgsdcFzj8= Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 13:43:21 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Frank Scheiner Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, allen.lkml@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, conor@kernel.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@roeck-us.net, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, patches@kernelci.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, pavel@denx.de, rwarsow@gmx.de, shuah@kernel.org, srw@sladewatkins.net, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, =?utf-8?B?VG9tw6HFoQ==?= Glozar Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/284] 5.10.221-rc2 review Message-ID: <2024071543-footing-vantage-bd4f@gregkh> References: <20240704094505.095988824@linuxfoundation.org> <76458f11-0ca4-4d3b-a9bc-916399f76b54@web.de> <2024071237-hypnotize-lethargic-98f2@gregkh> <07a7bc4b-9b71-486f-8666-d3b3593d682c@web.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <07a7bc4b-9b71-486f-8666-d3b3593d682c@web.de> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 04:19:39PM +0200, Frank Scheiner wrote: > On 12.07.24 15:32, Greg KH wrote: > > I'm confused, which commit should we add, or should we just revert what > > we have now? > > Sorry for the confusion. Let me try again: > > 1. efi: memmap: Move manipulation routines into x86 arch tree > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/commit/?h=linux-5.10.y&id=31e0721aeabde29371f624f56ce2f403508527a5 > > ...breaks the build for ia64, because it requires a header that does not > exist before 8ff059b8531f3b98e14f0461859fc7cdd95823e4 for ia64. > > 2. efi: ia64: move IA64-only declarations to new asm/efi.h header > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8ff059b8531f3b98e14f0461859fc7cdd95823e4 > > adds this header and fixes the ia64 build, see for example [1]. > > [1]: > https://github.com/linux-ia64/linux-stable-rc/actions/runs/9871144965#summary-27258970494 > > From my understanding 31e0721aeabde29371f624f56ce2f403508527a5 should > not be merged w/o 8ff059b8531f3b98e14f0461859fc7cdd95823e4, which also > seems to be the case for all other stable kernels from linux-5.12.y up. > > So 8ff059b8531f3b98e14f0461859fc7cdd95823e4 should be added, too, if > 31e0721aeabde29371f624f56ce2f403508527a5 stays in. Ok, thanks, now queued up. > > And I thought that ia64 was dead? > > No, actually it's alive and well - just currently outside of mainline - > but still in the stable kernels up to linux-6.6.y and for newer kernels > patched back in. If you want to check on our CI ([2]), all current > stable kernels build fine for ia64 and run in Ski - but linux-5.10.y > currently only because I manually added > 8ff059b8531f3b98e14f0461859fc7cdd95823e4 to the list of patches applied > by the CI. > > [2]: https://github.com/linux-ia64/linux-stable-rc/actions/runs/9901808825 Will be interesting to see how long it lasts, good luck! greg k-h