From: Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@endlessos.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "Johan Hovold" <johan@kernel.org>,
"David Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
"Nirmal Patel" <nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com>,
"Jonathan Derrick" <jonathan.derrick@linux.dev>,
"Paul M Stillwell Jr" <paul.m.stillwell.jr@intel.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux@endlessos.org, "Jian-Hong Pan" <jhp@endlessos.org>
Subject: [PATCH v8 4/4] PCI/ASPM: Fix L1.2 parameters when enable link state
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 16:02:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240719080255.10998-2-jhp@endlessos.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240719075200.10717-2-jhp@endlessos.org>
Currently, when enable link's L1.2 features with __pci_enable_link_state(),
it configs the link directly without ensuring related L1.2 parameters, such
as T_POWER_ON, Common_Mode_Restore_Time, and LTR_L1.2_THRESHOLD have been
programmed.
This leads the link's L1.2 between PCIe Root Port and child device gets
wrong configs when a caller tries to enabled it.
Here is a failed example on ASUS B1400CEAE with enabled VMD:
10000:e0:06.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 11th Gen Core Processor PCIe Controller (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
...
Capabilities: [200 v1] L1 PM Substates
L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1+ ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1+ L1_PM_Substates+
PortCommonModeRestoreTime=45us PortTPowerOnTime=50us
L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1-
T_CommonMode=45us LTR1.2_Threshold=101376ns
L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=50us
10000:e1:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Sandisk Corp WD Blue SN550 NVMe SSD (rev 01) (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])
...
Capabilities: [900 v1] L1 PM Substates
L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1- L1_PM_Substates+
PortCommonModeRestoreTime=32us PortTPowerOnTime=10us
L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1-
T_CommonMode=0us LTR1.2_Threshold=0ns
L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=10us
According to "PCIe r6.0, sec 5.5.4", before enabling ASPM L1.2 on the PCIe
Root Port and the child NVMe, they should be programmed with the same
LTR1.2_Threshold value. However, they have different values in this case.
Invoke aspm_calc_l12_info() to program the L1.2 parameters properly before
enable L1.2 bits of L1 PM Substates Control Register in
__pci_enable_link_state().
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218394
Signed-off-by: Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@endlessos.org>
---
v2:
- Prepare the PCIe LTR parameters before enable L1 Substates
v3:
- Only enable supported features for the L1 Substates part
v4:
- Focus on fixing L1.2 parameters, instead of re-initializing whole L1SS
v5:
- Fix typo and commit message
- Split introducing aspm_get_l1ss_cap() to "PCI/ASPM: Introduce
aspm_get_l1ss_cap()"
v6:
- Skipped
v7:
- Pick back and rebase on the new version kernel
- Drop the link state flag check. And, always config link state's timing
parameters
v8:
- Because pcie_aspm_get_link() might return the link as NULL, move
getting the link's parent and child devices after check the link is
not NULL. This avoids NULL memory access.
drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
index 5db1044c9895..55ff1d26fcea 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
@@ -1411,9 +1411,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_disable_link_state);
static int __pci_enable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state, bool locked)
{
struct pcie_link_state *link = pcie_aspm_get_link(pdev);
+ u32 parent_l1ss_cap, child_l1ss_cap;
+ struct pci_dev *parent, *child;
if (!link)
return -EINVAL;
+
+ parent = link->pdev;
+ child = link->downstream;
+
/*
* A driver requested that ASPM be enabled on this device, but
* if we don't have permission to manage ASPM (e.g., on ACPI
@@ -1428,6 +1434,15 @@ static int __pci_enable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state, bool locked)
if (!locked)
down_read(&pci_bus_sem);
mutex_lock(&aspm_lock);
+ /*
+ * Ensure L1.2 parameters: Common_Mode_Restore_Times, T_POWER_ON and
+ * LTR_L1.2_THRESHOLD are programmed properly before enable bits for
+ * L1.2, per PCIe r6.0, sec 5.5.4.
+ */
+ parent_l1ss_cap = aspm_get_l1ss_cap(parent);
+ child_l1ss_cap = aspm_get_l1ss_cap(child);
+ aspm_calc_l12_info(link, parent_l1ss_cap, child_l1ss_cap);
+
link->aspm_default = pci_calc_aspm_enable_mask(state);
pcie_config_aspm_link(link, policy_to_aspm_state(link));
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-19 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-19 7:52 [PATCH v8 0/4] PCI: vmd: Enable PCI PM's L1 substates of remapped PCIe Root Port and NVMe Jian-Hong Pan
2024-07-19 7:55 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] PCI: vmd: Set PCI devices to D0 before enable PCI PM's L1 substates Jian-Hong Pan
2024-07-19 7:57 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] PCI/ASPM: Add notes about enabling PCI-PM L1SS to pci_enable_link_state(_locked) Jian-Hong Pan
2024-07-19 7:59 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] PCI/ASPM: Introduce aspm_get_l1ss_cap() Jian-Hong Pan
2024-07-19 8:02 ` Jian-Hong Pan [this message]
2024-08-02 8:24 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] PCI/ASPM: Fix L1.2 parameters when enable link state Jian-Hong Pan
2024-08-05 18:24 ` Nirmal Patel
2024-08-07 4:23 ` Jian-Hong Pan
2024-08-05 20:26 ` David E. Box
2024-08-07 10:05 ` Jian-Hong Pan
2024-08-07 11:18 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-08-07 23:27 ` David E. Box
2024-08-08 9:48 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-08-12 8:18 ` Jian-Hong Pan
2024-09-02 15:43 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-09-03 10:31 ` Jian-Hong Pan
2024-09-23 8:41 ` Jian-Hong Pan
2024-09-23 13:44 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-09-03 15:17 ` Nirmal Patel
2024-09-04 3:56 ` Jian-Hong Pan
2024-09-20 16:03 ` Nirmal Patel
2024-09-23 10:57 ` Jian-Hong Pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240719080255.10998-2-jhp@endlessos.org \
--to=jhp@endlessos.org \
--cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathan.derrick@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@endlessos.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com \
--cc=paul.m.stillwell.jr@intel.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox