* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/29] 6.9.12-rc1 review
2024-07-25 14:37 [PATCH 6.9 00/29] 6.9.12-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-07-25 19:53 ` Justin Forbes
2024-07-25 20:57 ` Peter Schneider
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Justin Forbes @ 2024-07-25 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 04:37:10PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.12 release.
> There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:27:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, ppc64le, s390x,
x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.
Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/29] 6.9.12-rc1 review
2024-07-25 14:37 [PATCH 6.9 00/29] 6.9.12-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-07-25 19:53 ` Justin Forbes
@ 2024-07-25 20:57 ` Peter Schneider
2024-07-25 23:22 ` SeongJae Park
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Peter Schneider @ 2024-07-25 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
Am 25.07.2024 um 16:37 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.12 release.
> There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Builds, boots and works on my 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon E5-2697 v2 server. No dmesg
oddities or regressions found.
Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>
Beste Grüße,
Peter Schneider
--
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you. -- David McCullough Jr.
OpenPGP: 0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@googlemail.com
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/29] 6.9.12-rc1 review
2024-07-25 14:37 [PATCH 6.9 00/29] 6.9.12-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-07-25 19:53 ` Justin Forbes
2024-07-25 20:57 ` Peter Schneider
@ 2024-07-25 23:22 ` SeongJae Park
2024-07-26 1:15 ` Markus Reichelt
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2024-07-25 23:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: SeongJae Park, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, damon
Hello,
On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 16:37:10 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.12 release.
> There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:27:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below. Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].
Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
[1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] 692f6ed6607e ("Linux 6.9.12-rc1")
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
---
ok 6 selftests: damon: debugfs_duplicate_context_creation.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon: debugfs_rm_non_contexts.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon: sysfs.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon: sysfs_update_removed_scheme_dir.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon: sysfs_update_schemes_tried_regions_hang.py
ok 13 selftests: damon: sysfs_update_schemes_tried_regions_wss_estimation.py
ok 14 selftests: damon: damos_quota.py
ok 15 selftests: damon: damos_apply_interval.py
ok 16 selftests: damon: reclaim.sh
ok 17 selftests: damon: lru_sort.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_m68k.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
[33m
[92mPASS [39m
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/29] 6.9.12-rc1 review
2024-07-25 14:37 [PATCH 6.9 00/29] 6.9.12-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-07-25 23:22 ` SeongJae Park
@ 2024-07-26 1:15 ` Markus Reichelt
2024-07-26 8:53 ` Ron Economos
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Markus Reichelt @ 2024-07-26 1:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable, linux-kernel
* Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.12 release.
> There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:27:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi Greg
6.9.12-rc1 compiles, boots and runs here on x86_64
(AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G, Slackware64-15.0)
Tested-by: Markus Reichelt <lkt+2023@mareichelt.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/29] 6.9.12-rc1 review
2024-07-25 14:37 [PATCH 6.9 00/29] 6.9.12-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-07-26 1:15 ` Markus Reichelt
@ 2024-07-26 8:53 ` Ron Economos
2024-07-26 11:37 ` Mark Brown
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2024-07-26 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 7/25/24 7:37 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.12 release.
> There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:27:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/29] 6.9.12-rc1 review
2024-07-25 14:37 [PATCH 6.9 00/29] 6.9.12-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-07-26 8:53 ` Ron Economos
@ 2024-07-26 11:37 ` Mark Brown
2024-07-26 16:30 ` Shuah Khan
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2024-07-26 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 344 bytes --]
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 04:37:10PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.12 release.
> There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/29] 6.9.12-rc1 review
2024-07-25 14:37 [PATCH 6.9 00/29] 6.9.12-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-07-26 11:37 ` Mark Brown
@ 2024-07-26 16:30 ` Shuah Khan
2024-07-26 17:18 ` Jon Hunter
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-07-26 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, Shuah Khan
On 7/25/24 08:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.12 release.
> There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:27:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/29] 6.9.12-rc1 review
2024-07-25 14:37 [PATCH 6.9 00/29] 6.9.12-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-07-26 16:30 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2024-07-26 17:18 ` Jon Hunter
2024-07-26 17:52 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-07-26 20:02 ` Florian Fainelli
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-07-26 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 16:37:10 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.12 release.
> There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:27:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.9:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 116 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.9.12-rc1-g692f6ed6607e
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/29] 6.9.12-rc1 review
2024-07-25 14:37 [PATCH 6.9 00/29] 6.9.12-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-07-26 17:18 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-07-26 17:52 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-07-26 20:02 ` Florian Fainelli
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-07-26 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 20:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.12 release.
> There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:27:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 6.9.12-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 692f6ed6607e027dbe476c8301112605c72385b2
* git describe: v6.9.11-30-g692f6ed6607e
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.9.y/build/v6.9.11-30-g692f6ed6607e
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.9.10-164-gebb35f61e5d3)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.9.10-164-gebb35f61e5d3)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.9.10-164-gebb35f61e5d3)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.9.10-164-gebb35f61e5d3)
## Test result summary
total: 253976, pass: 218579, fail: 5284, skip: 29585, xfail: 528
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 127 total, 127 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 17 total, 17 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 31 total, 31 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-smoketest
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/29] 6.9.12-rc1 review
2024-07-25 14:37 [PATCH 6.9 00/29] 6.9.12-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2024-07-26 17:52 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-07-26 20:02 ` Florian Fainelli
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-07-26 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 7/25/24 07:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.12 release.
> There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:27:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread