From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B60FB51C4A for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:24:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722180249; cv=none; b=mhISH8gF6lOmmyZFx7BoQ8yqQUPLrKJ4+AX7CbEdwseEKazvkxC64jSYmidYj3++dwa+OqsRUOsQkNfrEmLoFZzOiuMwQOy3V6QehJFn2VSLm3LVO/V8cwPP1knOZsYz6gg05MLJ8p6jEg2pKyYSKNvPq7/0dhtmijvByRAE9Nw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722180249; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IOwAsnqgHoluJc7mNb67jddHNZA6RYbBXNw2KHo1ji0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OxEX9cvPdcaMBq7NT5JKxLuO5u69JLk4XTWHQItvvYdnQ6IokWRaUGCwXSXYIXwnS1FCt7ZNr/tNR6A4BIzv8cX+3MikAFo0t4u3i1+q6C5UI1Zhaocty5eqYBCyxrbC6rTn24NYQEHQQHwjQTHyGKFevNaAu5g5/j2QPELTucw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=hQNdLsIl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="hQNdLsIl" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1722180246; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5bC7CjlZdsdHI4lvHiT2ExOZBWJ7XMhmuhfoptCNZqw=; b=hQNdLsIlItzkDPG97Tbgc91BSAXRd13R7qk49ma8jTRuMSI12RSyrJiwPceiWt3TLMpdp3 ksLdXYkyy6KcayM02HZYy8/l4ugr+KqoMoJnhScN1mMWOtVO5M7HkoQEJvh4EI723MoZv6 aYvqX8vgOQzR4OMIRwuveSkxf6GpQvM= Received: from mail-lj1-f197.google.com (mail-lj1-f197.google.com [209.85.208.197]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-253-cNZn_8WAPieNnGFmoikc3Q-1; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 11:24:00 -0400 X-MC-Unique: cNZn_8WAPieNnGFmoikc3Q-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f197.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2ef23a67c5bso26799621fa.3 for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 08:24:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1722180239; x=1722785039; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=5bC7CjlZdsdHI4lvHiT2ExOZBWJ7XMhmuhfoptCNZqw=; b=Hpc58ouSE8ilyAFDd+4w/3JitARl+RjWO3OuvfQTfZ7JVa8x3SCJ27jAby5tzwTdwC qNu8fPpt1HR+ytZ7TBLUP2Xzbdcnsa1fvtEzWY3Cc3bd3Qx9kVC4YvIm1UwWVswDS4SC iWOjeSqNOIHZs5W42FHD8vgBdBsmGjyd9Iq7fs+Tz2doUIVJkkleovTqvv6yy0kltGL7 vMiL1auJrR2Dw/4TGfc/lyvMgSKD9j91JuYV3ZZpSCT4OgT3kF2YgMG9YB70sZY+OopG AjuzHaMBtsW5UZlw0mNqwuoRvhD0ZI/4izs+PyPH0hguOeFIPo6mZNzRsI319DXu/sWj kndA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXf+Zvbiu+XlWn9IGx7CLdWuSR39cjY9Vu/3BUX1RFtlrncpRhSRFVyPscybT94+hdfAOXMGCllB6qwz23M5o7p0EuaVgYNxc6ztu18 X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzV7yOPXiyqWKch+Yc5JbgjrwP9k1crgSulZZXMMN71zsel+Kf8 jkvAlbWS648S0t+c80MiC5uCRMQfa3J4gcuvwMeLsdY0bHwghty4A8zK5DKjgSDbMZjogQE4SqN fU5Bqo1Sx4JHWTNxKSGLVIEN2dLKBqfV9MEHIMgQOJN9pxjTqtjo0M9w/KM7gsQ== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:be22:0:b0:2ef:1c0a:9b94 with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2f12edfddc0mr34329471fa.16.1722180238924; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 08:23:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEU13tBt+N37F7ob3Jx0ruuvo8+dsNp9muZtzaqjHOl31gS3qTrnO0jECcjoxvWesNrjNQyHQ== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:be22:0:b0:2ef:1c0a:9b94 with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2f12edfddc0mr34329181fa.16.1722180238084; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 08:23:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com ([2a0d:6fc7:55d:98c4:742e:26be:b52d:dd54]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-428054b9196sm147521925e9.0.2024.07.28.08.23.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 28 Jul 2024 08:23:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 11:23:49 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: David Woodhouse Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Richard Cochran , Peter Hilber , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, "Ridoux, Julien" , virtio-dev@lists.linux.dev, "Luu, Ryan" , "Chashper, David" , "Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem" , "Christopher S . Hall" , Jason Wang , John Stultz , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd , Thomas Gleixner , Xuan Zhuo , Marc Zyngier , Mark Rutland , Daniel Lezcano , Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , qemu-devel , Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptp: Add vDSO-style vmclock support Message-ID: <20240728111746-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20240725081502-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20240725082828-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20240725083215-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <98813a70f6d3377d3a9d502fd175be97334fcc87.camel@infradead.org> <20240726174958.00007d10@Huawei.com> <811E8A25-3DBC-452D-B594-F9B7B0B61335@infradead.org> <20240728062521-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <9817300C-9280-4CC3-B9DB-37D24C8C20B5@infradead.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9817300C-9280-4CC3-B9DB-37D24C8C20B5@infradead.org> On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 02:07:01PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On 28 July 2024 11:37:04 BST, "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > >Glad you asked :) > > Heh, I'm not sure I'm so glad. Did I mention I hate ACPI? Perhaps it's still not too late for me just to define a DT binding and use PRP0001 for it :) > > >Long story short, QEMUVGID is indeed out of spec, but it works > >both because of guest compatibility with ACPI 1.0, and because no one > >much uses it. > > > I think it's reasonable enough to follow that example and use AMZNVCLK (or QEMUVCLK, but there seems little point in both) then? I'd stick to spec. If you like puns, QEMUC10C maybe?