From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dma: add IOMMU static calls with clear default ops
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 17:07:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240729140736.GC5669@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZqeN6MP4o2JNLcUz@google.com>
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 12:41:12PM +0000, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> Hi Leon,
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 03:37:11PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> >
> > Most of the arch DMA ops (which often, but not always, involve
> > some sort of IOMMU) are using the same DMA operations. These DMA
> > operations are default ones implemented in drivers/iomem/dma-iommu.c.
> >
> > So let's make sure to call them directly without need to perform function
> > pointers dereference.
>
> Just out of curiosity, is there any observed improvement from that?
> As from my experience the DMA-IOMMU path is quite dense so it won't
> be senstive to such micro-optimizations.
DMA-IOMMU no, but NVMe driver which uses DMA-API in datapath will
potentially benefit from this change.
I personally used this change to simplify my "DMA split ... " series [1].
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/leon/linux-rdma.git/log/?h=dma-split-v2
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-29 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-17 12:37 [PATCH v2 0/2] DMA IOMMU static calls Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-17 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dma: call unconditionally to unmap_page and unmap_sg callbacks Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-18 3:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-18 6:33 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-17 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] dma: add IOMMU static calls with clear default ops Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-18 3:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-18 7:04 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-18 12:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-18 13:26 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-29 12:41 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-07-29 14:07 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2024-07-29 17:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-30 8:16 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-30 15:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240729140736.GC5669@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=eahariha@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox