Re: [PATCH 6.10 000/809] 6.10.3-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 04:03:30PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 7/30/24 08:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.3 release.
> > There are 809 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 01 Aug 2024 15:14:54 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.10.3-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> perf failed to build with the following error:
> 
> In file included from tests/pmu.c:7:
> tests/pmu.c: In function 'test__name_len':
> tests/pmu.c:400:25: error: too few arguments to function
> 'pmu_name_len_no_suffix'
>   TEST_ASSERT_VAL("cpu", pmu_name_len_no_suffix("cpu") == strlen("cpu"));
>                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> tests/tests.h:15:8: note: in definition of macro 'TEST_ASSERT_VAL'
>   if (!(cond)) {        \
>         ^~~~
> In file included from util/evsel.h:13,
>                  from util/evlist.h:14,
>                  from tests/pmu.c:2:
> util/pmus.h:8:5: note: declared here
>  int pmu_name_len_no_suffix(const char *str, unsigned long *num);
>      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from tests/pmu.c:7:
> 
> this is caused by 958e16410f96ee72efc7a93e5d1774e8a236f2f5 ("perf tests: Add
> some pmu core functionality tests")

Thanks, now dropped.  I'll do a -rc2 in a bit so that tests can verify
this works properly.

greg k-h