public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, acme@kernel.org,
	namhyung@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ak@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V4 2/5] perf: Extend perf_output_read
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 07:38:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240731143835.771618-3-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240731143835.771618-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

The event may have been updated in the PMU-specific implementation,
e.g., Intel PEBS counters snapshotting. The common code should not
read and overwrite the value.

The PERF_SAMPLE_READ in the data->sample_type can be used to detect
whether the PMU-specific value is available. If yes, avoid the
pmu->read() in the common code.

Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
 kernel/events/core.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index aa3450bdc227..fcc55d0b5848 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -7269,7 +7269,7 @@ static void perf_output_read_one(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
 
 static void perf_output_read_group(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
 			    struct perf_event *event,
-			    u64 enabled, u64 running)
+			    u64 enabled, u64 running, bool read)
 {
 	struct perf_event *leader = event->group_leader, *sub;
 	u64 read_format = event->attr.read_format;
@@ -7291,7 +7291,7 @@ static void perf_output_read_group(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
 	if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_RUNNING)
 		values[n++] = running;
 
-	if ((leader != event) &&
+	if ((leader != event) && read &&
 	    (leader->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE))
 		leader->pmu->read(leader);
 
@@ -7306,7 +7306,7 @@ static void perf_output_read_group(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
 	for_each_sibling_event(sub, leader) {
 		n = 0;
 
-		if ((sub != event) &&
+		if ((sub != event) && read &&
 		    (sub->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE))
 			sub->pmu->read(sub);
 
@@ -7333,7 +7333,8 @@ static void perf_output_read_group(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
  * on another CPU, from interrupt/NMI context.
  */
 static void perf_output_read(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
-			     struct perf_event *event)
+			     struct perf_event *event,
+			     bool read)
 {
 	u64 enabled = 0, running = 0, now;
 	u64 read_format = event->attr.read_format;
@@ -7351,7 +7352,7 @@ static void perf_output_read(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
 		calc_timer_values(event, &now, &enabled, &running);
 
 	if (event->attr.read_format & PERF_FORMAT_GROUP)
-		perf_output_read_group(handle, event, enabled, running);
+		perf_output_read_group(handle, event, enabled, running, read);
 	else
 		perf_output_read_one(handle, event, enabled, running);
 }
@@ -7393,7 +7394,7 @@ void perf_output_sample(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
 		perf_output_put(handle, data->period);
 
 	if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_READ)
-		perf_output_read(handle, event);
+		perf_output_read(handle, event, !(data->sample_flags & PERF_SAMPLE_READ));
 
 	if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN) {
 		int size = 1;
@@ -7994,7 +7995,7 @@ perf_event_read_event(struct perf_event *event,
 		return;
 
 	perf_output_put(&handle, read_event);
-	perf_output_read(&handle, event);
+	perf_output_read(&handle, event, true);
 	perf_event__output_id_sample(event, &handle, &sample);
 
 	perf_output_end(&handle);
-- 
2.38.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-31 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-31 14:38 [PATCH V4 0/5] Support Lunar Lake and Arrow Lake core PMU kan.liang
2024-07-31 14:38 ` [PATCH V4 1/5] perf/x86: Extend event update interface kan.liang
2024-08-01 14:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-08-01 15:31     ` Liang, Kan
2024-08-01 16:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-08-01 19:18         ` Liang, Kan
2024-07-31 14:38 ` kan.liang [this message]
2024-07-31 14:38 ` [PATCH V4 3/5] perf/x86/intel: Move PEBS event update after the sample output kan.liang
2024-07-31 14:38 ` [PATCH V4 4/5] perf/x86/intel: Support PEBS counters snapshotting kan.liang
2024-07-31 14:38 ` [PATCH V4 5/5] perf/x86/intel: Support RDPMC metrics clear mode kan.liang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240731143835.771618-3-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox