[PATCH net-next] net: phy: qca807x: Drop unnecessary and broken DT validation

["Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>]

The check for "leds" and "gpio-controller" both being present is never
true because "leds" is a node, not a property. This could be fixed
with a check for child node, but there's really no need for the kernel
to validate a DT. Just continue ignoring the LEDs if GPIOs are present.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/net/phy/qcom/qca807x.c | 10 ----------
 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/qcom/qca807x.c b/drivers/net/phy/qcom/qca807x.c
index 672c6929119a..ba558486c72f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/qcom/qca807x.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/qcom/qca807x.c
@@ -733,16 +733,6 @@ static int qca807x_probe(struct phy_device *phydev)
 								     "qcom,dac-disable-bias-current-tweak");
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GPIOLIB)
-	/* Make sure we don't have mixed leds node and gpio-controller
-	 * to prevent registering leds and having gpio-controller usage
-	 * conflicting with them.
-	 */
-	if (of_find_property(node, "leds", NULL) &&
-	    of_find_property(node, "gpio-controller", NULL)) {
-		phydev_err(phydev, "Invalid property detected. LEDs and gpio-controller are mutually exclusive.");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	/* Do not register a GPIO controller unless flagged for it */
 	if (of_property_read_bool(node, "gpio-controller")) {
 		ret = qca807x_gpio(phydev);
-- 
2.43.0