From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: David Hunter <david.hunter.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, julia.lawall@inria.fr,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of.c: replace of_node_put with __free improves cleanup
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 18:55:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240801235526.GA129068@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240719223805.102929-1-david.hunter.linux@gmail.com>
[+cc Rob, Jonathan]
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 06:38:05PM -0400, David Hunter wrote:
> The use of the __free function allows the cleanup to be based on scope
> instead of on another function called later. This makes the cleanup
> automatic and less susceptible to errors later.
>
> This code was compiled without errors or warnings.
I *think* this looks OK, but I'm not comfy with all this scope magic
yet, so would like Jonathan and/or Rob to take a peek too.
And is there some way to include a hint here about how to find the
implicit of_node_put()? I think it's this from 9448e55d032d ("of: Add
cleanup.h based auto release via __free(device_node) markings"):
+DEFINE_FREE(device_node, struct device_node *, if (_T) of_node_put(_T))
but it did take some looking to find it.
If it looks good, I'll tweak the commit log to use imperative mood:
https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=v6.9#n94
since this technically says what *could* happen but not what the patch
*does*.
> Signed-off-by: David Hunter <david.hunter.linux@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/of.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c
> index b908fe1ae951..8b150982f5cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/of.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/of.c
> @@ -616,16 +616,14 @@ int devm_of_pci_bridge_init(struct device *dev, struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
>
> void of_pci_remove_node(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> - struct device_node *np;
> + struct device_node *np __free(device_node) = pci_device_to_OF_node(pdev);
>
> - np = pci_device_to_OF_node(pdev);
> if (!np || !of_node_check_flag(np, OF_DYNAMIC))
> return;
> pdev->dev.of_node = NULL;
>
> of_changeset_revert(np->data);
> of_changeset_destroy(np->data);
> - of_node_put(np);
> }
>
> void of_pci_make_dev_node(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-01 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-19 22:38 [PATCH] of.c: replace of_node_put with __free improves cleanup David Hunter
2024-08-01 23:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2024-08-07 10:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-07 16:18 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240801235526.GA129068@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=david.hunter.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com \
--cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox