From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: void@manifault.com, peterz@infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
mingo@redhat.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] sched_ext: Simplify UP support by enabling sched_class->balance() in UP
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 16:40:11 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240804024047.100355-5-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240804024047.100355-1-tj@kernel.org>
On SMP, SCX performs dispatch from sched_class->balance(). As balance() was
not available in UP, it instead called the internal balance function from
put_prev_task_scx() and pick_next_task_scx() to emulate the effect, which is
rather nasty.
Enabling sched_class->balance() on UP shouldn't cause any meaningful
overhead. Enable balance() on UP and drop the ugly workaround.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 4 +---
kernel/sched/ext.c | 41 +----------------------------------------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 0532b27fd9af..d2ccc2c4b4d3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5826,7 +5826,6 @@ static inline void schedule_debug(struct task_struct *prev, bool preempt)
static void put_prev_task_balance(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
struct rq_flags *rf)
{
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
const struct sched_class *start_class = prev->sched_class;
const struct sched_class *class;
@@ -5849,10 +5848,9 @@ static void put_prev_task_balance(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
* a runnable task of @class priority or higher.
*/
for_active_class_range(class, start_class, &idle_sched_class) {
- if (class->balance(rq, prev, rf))
+ if (class->balance && class->balance(rq, prev, rf))
break;
}
-#endif
put_prev_task(rq, prev);
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index 48f8f57f5954..09f394bb4889 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -2616,7 +2616,6 @@ static int balance_one(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, bool local)
return has_tasks;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
static int balance_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
struct rq_flags *rf)
{
@@ -2650,7 +2649,6 @@ static int balance_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
return ret;
}
-#endif
static void set_next_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
{
@@ -2719,37 +2717,6 @@ static void process_ddsp_deferred_locals(struct rq *rq)
static void put_prev_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
-#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
- /*
- * UP workaround.
- *
- * Because SCX may transfer tasks across CPUs during dispatch, dispatch
- * is performed from its balance operation which isn't called in UP.
- * Let's work around by calling it from the operations which come right
- * after.
- *
- * 1. If the prev task is on SCX, pick_next_task() calls
- * .put_prev_task() right after. As .put_prev_task() is also called
- * from other places, we need to distinguish the calls which can be
- * done by looking at the previous task's state - if still queued or
- * dequeued with %SCX_DEQ_SLEEP, the caller must be pick_next_task().
- * This case is handled here.
- *
- * 2. If the prev task is not on SCX, the first following call into SCX
- * will be .pick_next_task(), which is covered by calling
- * balance_scx() from pick_next_task_scx().
- *
- * Note that we can't merge the first case into the second as
- * balance_scx() must be called before the previous SCX task goes
- * through put_prev_task_scx().
- *
- * @rq is pinned and can't be unlocked. As UP doesn't transfer tasks
- * around, balance_one() doesn't need to.
- */
- if (p->scx.flags & (SCX_TASK_QUEUED | SCX_TASK_DEQD_FOR_SLEEP))
- balance_one(rq, p, true);
-#endif
-
update_curr_scx(rq);
/* see dequeue_task_scx() on why we skip when !QUEUED */
@@ -2807,12 +2774,6 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_scx(struct rq *rq)
{
struct task_struct *p;
-#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
- /* UP workaround - see the comment at the head of put_prev_task_scx() */
- if (unlikely(rq->curr->sched_class != &ext_sched_class))
- balance_one(rq, rq->curr, true);
-#endif
-
p = first_local_task(rq);
if (!p)
return NULL;
@@ -3673,6 +3634,7 @@ DEFINE_SCHED_CLASS(ext) = {
.wakeup_preempt = wakeup_preempt_scx,
+ .balance = balance_scx,
.pick_next_task = pick_next_task_scx,
.put_prev_task = put_prev_task_scx,
@@ -3681,7 +3643,6 @@ DEFINE_SCHED_CLASS(ext) = {
.switch_class = switch_class_scx,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- .balance = balance_scx,
.select_task_rq = select_task_rq_scx,
.task_woken = task_woken_scx,
.set_cpus_allowed = set_cpus_allowed_scx,
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 42b4d1428c2c..9b88a46d3fce 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -2357,6 +2357,7 @@ struct sched_class {
void (*wakeup_preempt)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags);
+ int (*balance)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf);
struct task_struct *(*pick_next_task)(struct rq *rq);
void (*put_prev_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
@@ -2365,7 +2366,6 @@ struct sched_class {
void (*switch_class)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- int (*balance)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf);
int (*select_task_rq)(struct task_struct *p, int task_cpu, int flags);
struct task_struct * (*pick_task)(struct rq *rq);
--
2.46.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-04 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-04 2:40 [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-6.12] sched_ext: Misc updates Tejun Heo
2024-08-04 2:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] sched_ext: Simplify scx_can_stop_tick() invocation in sched_can_stop_tick() Tejun Heo
2024-08-05 17:55 ` David Vernet
2024-08-04 2:40 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched_ext: Add scx_enabled() test to @start_class promotion in put_prev_task_balance() Tejun Heo
2024-08-05 17:57 ` David Vernet
2024-08-04 2:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched_ext: Use update_curr_common() in update_curr_scx() Tejun Heo
2024-08-05 18:23 ` David Vernet
2024-08-04 2:40 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2024-08-05 19:49 ` [PATCH 4/6] sched_ext: Simplify UP support by enabling sched_class->balance() in UP David Vernet
2024-08-04 2:40 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched_ext: Improve comment on idle_sched_class exception in scx_task_iter_next_locked() Tejun Heo
2024-08-05 19:50 ` David Vernet
2024-08-04 2:40 ` [PATCH 6/6] sched_ext: Make task_can_run_on_remote_rq() use common task_allowed_on_cpu() Tejun Heo
2024-08-05 19:55 ` David Vernet
2024-08-06 8:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-08-06 17:04 ` Tejun Heo
2024-08-06 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2024-08-06 8:13 ` [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-6.12] sched_ext: Misc updates Peter Zijlstra
2024-08-06 19:39 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240804024047.100355-5-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox