From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB3951C578C; Tue, 6 Aug 2024 13:09:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.11.211 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722949785; cv=none; b=g8Yc7VjnLve4RHESj8FoCcjK/lyxYGUoF9eKg5e5aTa7fDlFH/d/FReZQ6e3rDbGCCoqU07kphPPOxGmgw7HXLYnDYOlOXp6QvOKaOeL4EYzkARxP4fVbPkQviz4EVA+9EDtOwScJ/26cp8ENlvPHgNsCJzg2OB05G/RObsIXEI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722949785; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4/+yfebmcCt+GYD9DilF4pN8420I0xcAx5yduelZnns=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=t39DXM4039AHi7m8m1/0/zWii8NGPwsZffgy2b/u+vUg0a6gPl/WlOgbi31QoEObRa1UIirRp3cjT6CqYmmI1qk/v+og0dPgMTPepKVO4cpSt3D+kaRw8+EktwNLoLkG93OkeTbzHfffElpJ5BNENtcBpAiA0DUTJ7oUglBwDgo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.11.211 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id D203E68CFE; Tue, 6 Aug 2024 15:09:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 15:09:38 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Christian Marangi Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Ulf Hansson , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Miquel Raynal , Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , Joern Engel , Keith Busch , Jens Axboe , Sagi Grimberg , Wolfram Sang , Florian Fainelli , Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] nvme: assign of_node to nvme device Message-ID: <20240806130938.GA12231@lst.de> References: <20240806114118.17198-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> <20240806114118.17198-3-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> <20240806124312.GB10156@lst.de> <66b21f20.5d0a0220.200175.4b9b@mx.google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <66b21f20.5d0a0220.200175.4b9b@mx.google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 03:03:24PM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote: > Well on embedded pure PCIe card most of the time are not a thing... > Unless it's an enterprise product, everything is integrated in the pcb > and not detachable for cost saving measure or also if the thing use PCIe > protocol but it tighlty coupled with the SoC. Yes, PCIe has a bunch of form factors, including just soldered on BGA devices, but none of that matters at all for the logical protocol. > This implementation is already very common for all kind of pcie devices > like wireless card, gpio expander that are integrated in the PCB and > require property in DT like calibration data, quirks or GPIO pin > definitions, i2c... Do you have a document on that/