Re: [PATCH] vfs: avoid spurious dentry ref/unref cycle on open

Al Viro
2024-08-07T07:05:54Z

On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 08:40:28AM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 8:33 AM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 07:23:00AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > > After having looked at the problem, how about the following
> > > series:
> > >
> > > 1/5) lift path_get() *AND* path_put() out of do_dentry_open()
> > > into the callers. The latter - conditional upon "do_dentry_open()
> > > has not set FMODE_OPENED". Equivalent transformation.
> > >
> > > 2/5) move path_get() we'd lifted into the callers past the
> > > call of do_dentry_open(), conditionally collapse it with path_put().
> > > You'd get e.g.
> > > int vfs_open(const struct path *path, struct file *file)
> > > {
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > file->f_path = *path;
> > > ret = do_dentry_open(file, NULL);
> > > if (!ret) {
> > > /*
> > > * Once we return a file with FMODE_OPENED, __fput() will call
> > > * fsnotify_close(), so we need fsnotify_open() here for
> > > * symmetry.
> > > */
> > > fsnotify_open(file);
> > > }
> > > if (file->f_mode & FMODE_OPENED)
> > > path_get(path);
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > Equivalent transformation, provided that nobody is playing silly
> > > buggers with reassigning ->f_path in their ->open() instances.
> > > They *really* should not - if anyone does, we'd better catch them
> > > and fix them^Wtheir code. Incidentally, if we find any such,
> > > we have a damn good reason to add asserts in the callers. As
> > > in, "if do_dentry_open() has set FMODE_OPENED, it would bloody
> > > better *not* modify ->f_path". <greps> Nope, nobody is that
> > > insane.
> > >
> > > 3/5) split vfs_open_consume() out of vfs_open() (possibly
> > > named vfs_open_borrow()), replace the call in do_open() with
> > > calling the new function.
> > >
> > > Trivially equivalent transformation.
> > >
> > > 4/5) Remove conditional path_get() from vfs_open_consume()
> > > and finish_open(). Add
> > > if (file->f_mode & FMODE_OPENED)
> > > path_get(&nd->path);
> > > before terminate_walk(nd); in path_openat().
> > >
> > > Equivalent transformation - see
> > > if (file->f_mode & (FMODE_OPENED | FMODE_CREATED)) {
> > > dput(nd->path.dentry);
> > > nd->path.dentry = dentry;
> > > return NULL;
> > > }
> > > in lookup_open() (which is where nd->path gets in sync with what
> > > had been given to do_dentry_open() in finish_open()); in case
> > > of vfs_open_consume() in do_open() it's in sync from the very
> > > beginning. And we never modify nd->path after those points.
> > > So we can move grabbing it downstream, keeping it under the
> > > same condition (which also happens to be true only if we'd
> > > called do_dentry_open(), so for all other paths through the
> > > whole thing it's a no-op.
> > >
> > > 5/5) replace
> > > if (file->f_mode & FMODE_OPENED)
> > > path_get(&nd->path);
> > > terminate_walk(nd);
> > > with
> > > if (file->f_mode & FMODE_OPENED) {
> > > nd->path.mnt = NULL;
> > > nd->path.dentry = NULL;
> > > }
> > > terminate_walk(nd);
> > > Again, an obvious equivalent transformation.
> >
> > BTW, similar to that, with that we could turn do_o_path()
> > into
> >
> > struct path path;
> > int error = path_lookupat(nd, flags, &path);
> > if (!error) {
> > audit_inode(nd->name, path.dentry, 0);
> > error = vfs_open_borrow(&path, file);
> > if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_OPENED))
> > path_put(&path);
> > }
> > return error;
> > }
> >
> > and perhaps do something similar in the vicinity of
> > vfs_tmpfile() / do_o_tmpfile().
>
> That's quite a bit of churn, but if you insist I can take a stab.

What I have in mind is something along the lines of COMPLETELY UNTESTED
git.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git #experimental-for-mateusz

It needs saner commit messages, references to your analysis of the
overhead, quite possibly a finer carve-up, etc. And it's really
completely untested - it builds, but I hadn't even tried to boot
the sucker, let alone give it any kind of beating, so consider that
as a quick illustration (slapped together at 3am, on top of 5 hours of
sleep yesterday) to what I'd been talking about and no more than that.