Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] PCI: Change the parent to correctly represent pcie hierarchy

[Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>]

On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 08:52:50AM +0530, Krishna chaitanya chundru wrote:
> Currently the pwrctl driver is child of pci-pci bridge driver,
> this will cause issue when suspend resume is introduced in the pwr
> control driver. If the supply is removed to the endpoint in the
> power control driver then the config space access by the
> pci-pci bridge driver can cause issues like Timeouts.

If "pci-pci bridge driver" refers to portdrv, please use "portdrv" to
avoid confusion.

Can you be a little more specific about config accesses by the bridge
driver?  Generally portdrv wouldn't touch devices below the bridge.
It sounds like you've tripped over something here, so you probably
have an example of a timeout.

s/pcie/PCIe/ in subject, although it'd be nice if the whole subject
could be a little more specific.  I don't think pwrctl is directly
part of the PCIe hierarchy, so I don't quite understand what you're
saying there.

> For this reason change the parent to controller from pci-pci bridge.
> 
> Fixes: 4565d2652a37 ("PCI/pwrctl: Add PCI power control core code")

Will need an ack from Bartosz, of course, since he added this.  Moved
from cc: to to: list to make sure he sees this.

> Signed-off-by: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/bus.c         | 3 ++-
>  drivers/pci/pwrctl/core.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/bus.c b/drivers/pci/bus.c
> index 55c853686051..15b42f0f588f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/bus.c
> @@ -328,6 +328,7 @@ void __weak pcibios_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *pdev) { }
>   */
>  void pci_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  {
> +	struct pci_host_bridge *host = pci_find_host_bridge(dev->bus);
>  	struct device_node *dn = dev->dev.of_node;
>  	int retval;
>  
> @@ -352,7 +353,7 @@ void pci_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  
>  	if (dev_of_node(&dev->dev) && pci_is_bridge(dev)) {
>  		retval = of_platform_populate(dev_of_node(&dev->dev), NULL, NULL,
> -					      &dev->dev);
> +					      host->dev.parent);

I'm not sure host->dev.parent is always valid.  There are
pci_create_root_bus() callers that supply a NULL parent pointer.

>  		if (retval)
>  			pci_err(dev, "failed to populate child OF nodes (%d)\n",
>  				retval);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pwrctl/core.c b/drivers/pci/pwrctl/core.c
> index feca26ad2f6a..4f2ffa0b0a5f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pwrctl/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pwrctl/core.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
>  #include <linux/property.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  
> +#include "../pci.h"
> +
>  static int pci_pwrctl_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
>  			     void *data)
>  {
> @@ -64,18 +66,23 @@ static int pci_pwrctl_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
>   */
>  int pci_pwrctl_device_set_ready(struct pci_pwrctl *pwrctl)
>  {
> +	struct pci_bus *bus;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!pwrctl->dev)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> +	bus = pci_find_bus(of_get_pci_domain_nr(pwrctl->dev->parent->of_node), 0);
> +	if (!bus)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	pwrctl->nb.notifier_call = pci_pwrctl_notify;
>  	ret = bus_register_notifier(&pci_bus_type, &pwrctl->nb);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	pci_lock_rescan_remove();
> -	pci_rescan_bus(to_pci_dev(pwrctl->dev->parent)->bus);
> +	pci_rescan_bus(bus);
>  	pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
>  
>  	return 0;
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>