From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/15] selftests/nolibc: use correct clang target for s390/powerz
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 16:54:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240810145450.GB9168@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240807-nolibc-llvm-v2-14-c20f2f5fc7c2@weissschuh.net>
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 11:51:50PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> The target names between GCC and clang differ for s390.
> While GCC uses "s390", clang uses "powerz".
(...)
> +# GCC uses "s390", clang "systemz"
> +CLANG_CROSS_FLAGS := $(subst --target=s390-linux,--target=systemz-linux,$(CLANG_CROSS_FLAGS))
Based on your successful tests, I think the "powerz" in the commit
message is the one to change here ;-)
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-10 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-07 21:51 [PATCH v2 00/15] tools/nolibc: improve LLVM/clang support Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-07 21:51 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] tools/nolibc: arm: use clang-compatible asm syntax Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-07 21:51 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] tools/nolibc: mips: load current function to $t9 Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-07 21:51 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] tools/nolibc: powerpc: limit stack-protector workaround to GCC Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-07 21:51 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] tools/nolibc: compiler: introduce __nolibc_has_attribute() Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-07 21:51 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] tools/nolibc: move entrypoint specifics to compiler.h Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-07 21:51 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] tools/nolibc: compiler: use attribute((naked)) if available Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-07 21:51 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] selftests/nolibc: report failure if no testcase passed Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-07 21:51 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] selftests/nolibc: avoid passing NULL to printf("%s") Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-07 21:51 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] selftests/nolibc: determine $(srctree) first Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-07 21:51 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] selftests/nolibc: add support for LLVM= parameter Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-07 21:51 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] selftests/nolibc: add cc-option compatible with clang cross builds Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-07 21:51 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] selftests/nolibc: run-tests.sh: avoid overwriting CFLAGS_EXTRA Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-07 21:51 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] selftests/nolibc: don't use libgcc when building with clang Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-07 21:51 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] selftests/nolibc: use correct clang target for s390/powerz Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-10 14:54 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2024-08-07 21:51 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] selftests/nolibc: run-tests.sh: allow building through LLVM Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-07 22:09 ` [PATCH v2 00/15] tools/nolibc: improve LLVM/clang support Shuah Khan
2024-08-10 14:57 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240810145450.GB9168@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox