From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FD1618B499 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 18:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723486361; cv=none; b=sn5SIIhWklMYU3VU77eraJEKHNtFld2Hq9Ge50giyzwPlESQ3yenT9KPhk1SkyfulFyhjHZWhb2R+z88uZ8dXRv0Dz0ZMuadu0cSFlebfQyJWEJMdhfIsv+vcfWjh/vE/ehgU94E8PEZ/99tmXpBksgmukezDF0l7RWUlZ890tU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723486361; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7RUkptmdOEoTaWI5G/XfwfT/YiV+5T3HhVmyBbiSmpw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=IiqRMvD4Bz+bzM41BQPQ6kx+lA7KkqT+JF52FprBIkb7bS46jFxivTFU4q7w7vNCtAp5wfxTP9xwz9C5VRbaSQJWlcdgKwIdyRzg6ECiCjbby3bQY/0Gkgytq/Z0vnR8l0z6UaPqueMU0iZONvCwylaeZaIYjKUoM7U+aRmK9Fs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=g+wNwXxF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="g+wNwXxF" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1723486356; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6aC2RF+//p0GJfjgH/iZrlW9ATLJl4mVfe8Rdc4jHgk=; b=g+wNwXxFxB696wqTE34xC3fI1p16vcRqwUy3waBW23AbkEbFJ/FUbKoDA41VlggRDAH8Tf eMdIsZd2oMzMeZ44UWrAcC7FvvpMKXnLYRYOmZkviarToeOH0dSGKlu1CeYcusU+gqxRRK CUzL94bLy/osHek5lSKN9HpHrES/1D8= Received: from mail-ot1-f70.google.com (mail-ot1-f70.google.com [209.85.210.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-441-_fdUnv7lOrqYrCmRkuKR2A-1; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 14:12:35 -0400 X-MC-Unique: _fdUnv7lOrqYrCmRkuKR2A-1 Received: by mail-ot1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-7093f4569b3so148711a34.1 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 11:12:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723486354; x=1724091154; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6aC2RF+//p0GJfjgH/iZrlW9ATLJl4mVfe8Rdc4jHgk=; b=pge56zN1XAypncuOi9rdDYFLvixM5Cg2JK3avxeNkXIUbpWxYMRJUQVU14kxiNdJjO xoyok9ApnpQFFlLyJlL4fJW0IB/QvjtCAmhom7Whgxnf43PSCiMb36YPIPm7PItXDgEM Q25AtviqRn9zrn/eJHS3ZN1nmKdd98yugy7X8aHUl5w2h7dGIY1fp50MoS7cnq7/g12c w0+Lrj89GvaKkF0HGPkeb13HF7aoLvxe1t5XalnpBSkMhRg6JwKDfMOcESifOrD9dlKM MvB2qg0qkprFrUFLZJpAuUCtdLwpVQNBc3Xsy2U+CKCEstqxjaMHq2sIPXlM9VKYJKsc Vxmg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxBwmBA9WGrwyP2z8h6XLOfUVU9oedXRROJDuXSgsLqJMyyofBq v2l1eKKxPv6Yg0ZKZGszsjzRcyUHAh1WCGhDfUt8HQ94bFoQwQsl/xmYjV4D8pUxM48jaMKmLC4 SdTL942RMGolA6D4Vw+K4pxr2v8ygX0e9x4hcfb++2qIo6TfJruRGzQ0aJuuc1WGCkXvctoaKZ7 bkRzGBVHZlTG59jw2bzgu+OeRSdZhO4z61JwDdGiuRuiY= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d25:b0:1ac:a26c:a07a with SMTP id e5c5f4694b2df-1b1a02f2896mr6055d.4.1723486353871; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 11:12:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFKB0h9tqBDznq7jPudw+rKB1F4j/lDBjBP5vz8Ij/mXfeVHheDU0KW5XKnOwJHdaPAJFxqTQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d25:b0:1ac:a26c:a07a with SMTP id e5c5f4694b2df-1b1a02f2896mr2555d.4.1723486353186; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 11:12:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from x1n.redhat.com (pool-99-254-121-117.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com. [99.254.121.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id af79cd13be357-7a4c7dee013sm268663985a.84.2024.08.12.11.12.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 12 Aug 2024 11:12:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Peter Xu To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Nicholas Piggin , David Hildenbrand , Matthew Wilcox , Andrew Morton , James Houghton , Huang Ying , "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , peterx@redhat.com, Vlastimil Babka , Rick P Edgecombe , Hugh Dickins , Borislav Petkov , Christophe Leroy , Michael Ellerman , Rik van Riel , Dan Williams , Mel Gorman , x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Dave Hansen , Dave Jiang , Oscar Salvador , Thomas Gleixner , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson , Paolo Bonzini , David Rientjes Subject: [PATCH v5 2/7] mm/mprotect: Push mmu notifier to PUDs Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 14:12:20 -0400 Message-ID: <20240812181225.1360970-3-peterx@redhat.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.45.0 In-Reply-To: <20240812181225.1360970-1-peterx@redhat.com> References: <20240812181225.1360970-1-peterx@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit mprotect() does mmu notifiers in PMD levels. It's there since 2014 of commit a5338093bfb4 ("mm: move mmu notifier call from change_protection to change_pmd_range"). At that time, the issue was that NUMA balancing can be applied on a huge range of VM memory, even if nothing was populated. The notification can be avoided in this case if no valid pmd detected, which includes either THP or a PTE pgtable page. Now to pave way for PUD handling, this isn't enough. We need to generate mmu notifications even on PUD entries properly. mprotect() is currently broken on PUD (e.g., one can easily trigger kernel error with dax 1G mappings already), this is the start to fix it. To fix that, this patch proposes to push such notifications to the PUD layers. There is risk on regressing the problem Rik wanted to resolve before, but I think it shouldn't really happen, and I still chose this solution because of a few reasons: 1) Consider a large VM that should definitely contain more than GBs of memory, it's highly likely that PUDs are also none. In this case there will have no regression. 2) KVM has evolved a lot over the years to get rid of rmap walks, which might be the major cause of the previous soft-lockup. At least TDP MMU already got rid of rmap as long as not nested (which should be the major use case, IIUC), then the TDP MMU pgtable walker will simply see empty VM pgtable (e.g. EPT on x86), the invalidation of a full empty region in most cases could be pretty fast now, comparing to 2014. 3) KVM has explicit code paths now to even give way for mmu notifiers just like this one, e.g. in commit d02c357e5bfa ("KVM: x86/mmu: Retry fault before acquiring mmu_lock if mapping is changing"). It'll also avoid contentions that may also contribute to a soft-lockup. 4) Stick with PMD layer simply don't work when PUD is there... We need one way or another to fix PUD mappings on mprotect(). Pushing it to PUD should be the safest approach as of now, e.g. there's yet no sign of huge P4D coming on any known archs. Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sean Christopherson Cc: Paolo Bonzini Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Rik van Riel Signed-off-by: Peter Xu --- mm/mprotect.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c index 37cf8d249405..d423080e6509 100644 --- a/mm/mprotect.c +++ b/mm/mprotect.c @@ -363,9 +363,6 @@ static inline long change_pmd_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, unsigned long next; long pages = 0; unsigned long nr_huge_updates = 0; - struct mmu_notifier_range range; - - range.start = 0; pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr); do { @@ -383,14 +380,6 @@ static inline long change_pmd_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, if (pmd_none(*pmd)) goto next; - /* invoke the mmu notifier if the pmd is populated */ - if (!range.start) { - mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, - MMU_NOTIFY_PROTECTION_VMA, 0, - vma->vm_mm, addr, end); - mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range); - } - _pmd = pmdp_get_lockless(pmd); if (is_swap_pmd(_pmd) || pmd_trans_huge(_pmd) || pmd_devmap(_pmd)) { if ((next - addr != HPAGE_PMD_SIZE) || @@ -431,9 +420,6 @@ static inline long change_pmd_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, cond_resched(); } while (pmd++, addr = next, addr != end); - if (range.start) - mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range); - if (nr_huge_updates) count_vm_numa_events(NUMA_HUGE_PTE_UPDATES, nr_huge_updates); return pages; @@ -443,22 +429,36 @@ static inline long change_pud_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma, p4d_t *p4d, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, pgprot_t newprot, unsigned long cp_flags) { + struct mmu_notifier_range range; pud_t *pud; unsigned long next; long pages = 0, ret; + range.start = 0; + pud = pud_offset(p4d, addr); do { next = pud_addr_end(addr, end); ret = change_prepare(vma, pud, pmd, addr, cp_flags); - if (ret) - return ret; + if (ret) { + pages = ret; + break; + } if (pud_none_or_clear_bad(pud)) continue; + if (!range.start) { + mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, + MMU_NOTIFY_PROTECTION_VMA, 0, + vma->vm_mm, addr, end); + mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range); + } pages += change_pmd_range(tlb, vma, pud, addr, next, newprot, cp_flags); } while (pud++, addr = next, addr != end); + if (range.start) + mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range); + return pages; } -- 2.45.0