Re: [PATCH v4 07/12] kconfig: Add files for handling expressions

[Ole Schuerks <ole0811sch@gmail.com>]

On 8/12/24 10:46, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 3:54 PM Ole Schuerks <ole0811sch@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> To translate the Kconfig-model into propositional logic and resolve
>> conflicts, we need to handle propostional formulas.
>> These files contain many functions and macros to deal with
>> propositional formulas.
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Patrick Franz <deltaone@debian.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Patrick Franz <deltaone@debian.org>
>> Co-developed-by: Ibrahim Fayaz <phayax@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ibrahim Fayaz <phayax@gmail.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
>> Tested-by: Evgeny Groshev <eugene.groshev@gmail.com>
>> Suggested-by: Sarah Nadi <nadi@ualberta.ca>
>> Suggested-by: Thorsten Berger <thorsten.berger@rub.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Berger <thorsten.berger@rub.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Ole Schuerks <ole0811sch@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  scripts/kconfig/cf_expr.c | 2594 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  scripts/kconfig/cf_expr.h |  296 +++++
>>  2 files changed, 2890 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 scripts/kconfig/cf_expr.c
>>  create mode 100644 scripts/kconfig/cf_expr.h

>> +/*
>> + * convert a fexpr to a pexpr
>> + */
>> +struct pexpr *pexf(struct fexpr *fe)
>
>
>
>
> Not only this one, but more descriptive function name please.
>
> "pexf", so what?
> I do not understand what it is doing from the name.
>
>

Could you give us one or two examples of what other functions have bad 
names? I didn't find anything as bad as pexf() so I'm not sure what the 
expectations are. Thank you, that would be helpful.