From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3F26C8C0; Sat, 17 Aug 2024 15:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.196 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723909651; cv=none; b=iyi9TahtKy+BLXViwXqrekH+cL8BJtg2K718mB+7XG5g9nOrfEyE3Jle2lGJzEe7qgGjKIB7Z8hOftb0DDPEYkefezATTMaU+geejw+2X7H4VMMUwtEAtCS6dEF4awdm5UERC3hTTxhq8RIiB/XJTcqP3d3saTcObz1JpXlt7dU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723909651; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lmqePAThAmEXa5Omwlik3LsrOE7yjU2UB1JVB9/5sVg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bOi8qlZ3o/d+cshDx61dJFUiwRRbPQ8pHS20bKzay4sIomc48rCLa4GiBEvda5EWxeJRrr1n0eJFwYkdeP6XNFzCITxPUlelBiDcaHHf7/IAVwCwKxfRIKLePlBzXdeFXo1C3+oGfTMuCmVDEsNYUqWYjT+eoqYfvd9Svj5UYV8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=HVNf0LRT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.196 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="HVNf0LRT" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A26FE0003; Sat, 17 Aug 2024 15:47:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1723909641; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=O4tAB4S3uOiq7D418XEUK0C4GJJ3oRKt4ozyQqoAZI8=; b=HVNf0LRT2gRPTSsV2MNlX7GpF9q06DiFWgMH/cOem3yoGNOKDc1cmVtcqfcU7yh5Xeb/0Z wqnoGzH50VnDSLcb8CZckiZmjtbZaCvGKBHtOnC5S3W4p7yszu/2NP+CMIsyd0dMbsWhUE 5bSO4CVfmYAV09S3O/Ca5VIAJCFWmWl9wVSSoO1nSdrAcbGY3TRdMrGX2sj+SoK5IsNkqE 1yTYJRclkUQfZNYGrEqN/VKYnGvgT84LwLnaO6Sn0xicuK7ZqWEFBh+LGURB1/Rgs8Hbhc kCamJeKZ4MFWM/ni9icKK8d7gE26XfWIszklmi1s6IzF/wLKymB/LEAw2G0gEw== Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 17:47:15 +0200 From: Thomas Petazzoni To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Christophe Leroy , Jakub Kicinski , Russell King , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Herve Codina , Florian Fainelli , Heiner Kallweit , Vladimir Oltean , =?UTF-8?B?S8O2cnk=?= Maincent , Jesse Brandeburg , Marek =?UTF-8?B?QmVow7pu?= , Piergiorgio Beruto , Oleksij Rempel , =?UTF-8?B?Tmljb2zDsg==?= Veronese , Simon Horman , mwojtas@chromium.org, Nathan Chancellor , Antoine Tenart , Marc Kleine-Budde , Dan Carpenter , Romain Gantois , Maxime Chevallier Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v17 00/14] Introduce PHY listing and link_topology tracking Message-ID: <20240817174715.77522d52@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <6b84cdf2-34c8-4e61-857e-79a1d5e782da@lunn.ch> References: <20240709063039.2909536-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> <20240715083106.479093a6@kernel.org> <20240716101626.3d54a95d@fedora-2.home> <20240717082658.247939de@kernel.org> <6b84cdf2-34c8-4e61-857e-79a1d5e782da@lunn.ch> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.43; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-GND-Sasl: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com Hello Andrew, On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 17:43:52 +0200 Andrew Lunn wrote: > > Jakub, as you say it looks solid. I can add to that that I have been using > > this series widely through the double Ethernet attachment on several boards > > and it works well, it is stable and more performant than the dirty home-made > > solution we had on v4.14. > > Have you posted a Tested-by: > > You can also post Reviewed-by: if you have taken a look at the > code. It won't have the same value as one from Rusell, but it does add > some degree of warm fuzzy feeling this code is O.K, and it starts > building your reputation as a reviewer. Hmm did you check the replies from Christophe to each patch of this series? He has already posted a Tested-by and Reviewed-by to every single patch in the series :-) Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com