From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 656D814B94B; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 19:39:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724182798; cv=none; b=Pw97sSr4ujbBpnm1fqUkKHpEwRUQShR6JTCavb4c0HT951gY+aWGkei+6C8TkOU6ie9+vhExoGXOFjZYCyXuethoJI3xbbAnANgAIsPVOJuBafGEmu6xkLlRsL9c9+3kSZVbzO7Lfljnxjd4gIj1EwcaQp8Br9at7pXj5iFYUAg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724182798; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eet258ZmfZhKKtJwJUN7C598plW54ADv5Xh+PzuuGlY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lG1o4gYeBReUYtTATCLK9Xcqxd6WPEqUmrVQHRCrNjDiOB/9Nd3sxzi8W68ZoGxq9XTMw+wrX294Fo0nPMti7CGiF/xgxjymsFvEocLDEGiVhqlSe21tfslIvQmQ0LGkAlC36zyvK5fW02ElSDCKsj7YuK7HyueyQCOJ0v66IVA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=MCrg++6R; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="MCrg++6R" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1724182795; x=1755718795; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=eet258ZmfZhKKtJwJUN7C598plW54ADv5Xh+PzuuGlY=; b=MCrg++6RBR1Pnr3JQzz/CNlb+or+of+6cQiw9tSCMbjbgnNDh3CGak3W +s1p6fZFpdo25bbAomE3p9S9OBwV/lZQE361xy1PVoQq5mO82k0fmYaRz Bq4+AC/hGZpZkwMPGLNSvkX76SrMdMhQe1+fSXIc2iLU/oH5SDZnWDQlX LyLGyqdpPKNoW+Tr6QI9NVKVGsQtYajUPZCxkpVH/cOxtiuoDE5L4X5A6 v5DTw6mwhK2wg11FdZ0RVi8BjHo+ZlwsEXL1V3HTcMFN6L3fOO5LwgBkc QRv99HZ07IwlnGgStK6s8aR+x8po2Za+YVsX9dY/dgSETgzYQclS6Bk1J Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: TYGdOCngSCKwIupvm8xp1A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: yIjVp0fHRYOyZ4agwKoCPA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11170"; a="22372641" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,162,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="22372641" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Aug 2024 12:39:55 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: E7KFSF83RlWgQgxLEKNz3A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 8ngfMDiLTICNrsNrsKuyFw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,162,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="98315039" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 9a732dc145d3) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Aug 2024 12:39:52 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 9a732dc145d3 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sgUhp-000AY8-19; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 19:39:49 +0000 Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 03:39:26 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Juergen Gross , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Juergen Gross , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Boris Ostrovsky , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] xen: allow mapping ACPI data using a different physical address Message-ID: <202408210336.uafTZlvc-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240820082012.31316-7-jgross@suse.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240820082012.31316-7-jgross@suse.com> Hi Juergen, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on tip/x86/core] [also build test ERROR on rafael-pm/linux-next rafael-pm/bleeding-edge linus/master v6.11-rc4 next-20240820] [cannot apply to xen-tip/linux-next] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Juergen-Gross/xen-use-correct-end-address-of-kernel-for-conflict-checking/20240820-162344 base: tip/x86/core patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240820082012.31316-7-jgross%40suse.com patch subject: [PATCH v2 6/7] xen: allow mapping ACPI data using a different physical address config: x86_64-randconfig-004-20240820 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240821/202408210336.uafTZlvc-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240821/202408210336.uafTZlvc-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408210336.uafTZlvc-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:64: >> arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h:179:42: error: unknown type name 'acpi_physical_address' 179 | extern void __iomem * (*acpi_os_ioremap)(acpi_physical_address phys, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h:180:42: error: unknown type name 'acpi_size' 180 | acpi_size size); | ^~~~~~~~~ arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h:181:35: error: unknown type name 'acpi_physical_address' 181 | void __iomem *x86_acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h:181:63: error: unknown type name 'acpi_size' 181 | void __iomem *x86_acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size); | ^~~~~~~~~ vim +/acpi_physical_address +179 arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h 176 177 #ifdef CONFIG_XEN_PV_DOM0 178 /* A Xen PV dom0 needs a special acpi_os_ioremap() handling. */ > 179 extern void __iomem * (*acpi_os_ioremap)(acpi_physical_address phys, > 180 acpi_size size); 181 void __iomem *x86_acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size); 182 #define acpi_os_ioremap acpi_os_ioremap 183 #endif 184 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki