From: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@linux.intel.com>
To: srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com,
ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, hdegoede@redhat.com
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] platform/x86/intel-uncore-freq: Add efficiency latency control to sysfs interface
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 16:10:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240821131321.824326-4-tero.kristo@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240821131321.824326-1-tero.kristo@linux.intel.com>
Add the TPMI efficiency latency control fields to the sysfs interface.
The sysfs files are mapped to the TPMI uncore driver via the registered
uncore_read and uncore_write driver callbacks. These fields are not
populated on older non TPMI hardware.
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@linux.intel.com>
---
.../uncore-frequency-common.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++---
.../uncore-frequency-common.h | 13 +++++-
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/uncore-frequency/uncore-frequency-common.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/uncore-frequency/uncore-frequency-common.c
index 4e880585cbe4..e22b683a7a43 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/uncore-frequency/uncore-frequency-common.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/uncore-frequency/uncore-frequency-common.c
@@ -60,11 +60,16 @@ static ssize_t show_attr(struct uncore_data *data, char *buf, enum uncore_index
static ssize_t store_attr(struct uncore_data *data, const char *buf, ssize_t count,
enum uncore_index index)
{
- unsigned int input;
+ unsigned int input = 0;
int ret;
- if (kstrtouint(buf, 10, &input))
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (index == UNCORE_INDEX_EFF_LAT_CTRL_HIGH_THRESHOLD_ENABLE) {
+ if (kstrtobool(buf, (bool *)&input))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ } else {
+ if (kstrtouint(buf, 10, &input))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
mutex_lock(&uncore_lock);
ret = uncore_write(data, input, index);
@@ -103,6 +108,18 @@ show_uncore_attr(max_freq_khz, UNCORE_INDEX_MAX_FREQ);
show_uncore_attr(current_freq_khz, UNCORE_INDEX_CURRENT_FREQ);
+store_uncore_attr(elc_low_threshold_percent, UNCORE_INDEX_EFF_LAT_CTRL_LOW_THRESHOLD);
+store_uncore_attr(elc_high_threshold_percent, UNCORE_INDEX_EFF_LAT_CTRL_HIGH_THRESHOLD);
+store_uncore_attr(elc_high_threshold_enable,
+ UNCORE_INDEX_EFF_LAT_CTRL_HIGH_THRESHOLD_ENABLE);
+store_uncore_attr(elc_floor_freq_khz, UNCORE_INDEX_EFF_LAT_CTRL_FREQ);
+
+show_uncore_attr(elc_low_threshold_percent, UNCORE_INDEX_EFF_LAT_CTRL_LOW_THRESHOLD);
+show_uncore_attr(elc_high_threshold_percent, UNCORE_INDEX_EFF_LAT_CTRL_HIGH_THRESHOLD);
+show_uncore_attr(elc_high_threshold_enable,
+ UNCORE_INDEX_EFF_LAT_CTRL_HIGH_THRESHOLD_ENABLE);
+show_uncore_attr(elc_floor_freq_khz, UNCORE_INDEX_EFF_LAT_CTRL_FREQ);
+
#define show_uncore_data(member_name) \
static ssize_t show_##member_name(struct kobject *kobj, \
struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)\
@@ -146,7 +163,8 @@ show_uncore_data(initial_max_freq_khz);
static int create_attr_group(struct uncore_data *data, char *name)
{
- int ret, freq, index = 0;
+ int ret, index = 0;
+ unsigned int val;
init_attribute_rw(max_freq_khz);
init_attribute_rw(min_freq_khz);
@@ -168,10 +186,24 @@ static int create_attr_group(struct uncore_data *data, char *name)
data->uncore_attrs[index++] = &data->initial_min_freq_khz_kobj_attr.attr;
data->uncore_attrs[index++] = &data->initial_max_freq_khz_kobj_attr.attr;
- ret = uncore_read(data, &freq, UNCORE_INDEX_CURRENT_FREQ);
+ ret = uncore_read(data, &val, UNCORE_INDEX_CURRENT_FREQ);
if (!ret)
data->uncore_attrs[index++] = &data->current_freq_khz_kobj_attr.attr;
+ ret = uncore_read(data, &val, UNCORE_INDEX_EFF_LAT_CTRL_LOW_THRESHOLD);
+ if (!ret) {
+ init_attribute_rw(elc_low_threshold_percent);
+ init_attribute_rw(elc_high_threshold_percent);
+ init_attribute_rw(elc_high_threshold_enable);
+ init_attribute_rw(elc_floor_freq_khz);
+
+ data->uncore_attrs[index++] = &data->elc_low_threshold_percent_kobj_attr.attr;
+ data->uncore_attrs[index++] = &data->elc_high_threshold_percent_kobj_attr.attr;
+ data->uncore_attrs[index++] =
+ &data->elc_high_threshold_enable_kobj_attr.attr;
+ data->uncore_attrs[index++] = &data->elc_floor_freq_khz_kobj_attr.attr;
+ }
+
data->uncore_attrs[index] = NULL;
data->uncore_attr_group.name = name;
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/uncore-frequency/uncore-frequency-common.h b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/uncore-frequency/uncore-frequency-common.h
index b5c7311bfa05..26c854cd5d97 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/uncore-frequency/uncore-frequency-common.h
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/uncore-frequency/uncore-frequency-common.h
@@ -34,6 +34,13 @@
* @domain_id_kobj_attr: Storage for kobject attribute domain_id
* @fabric_cluster_id_kobj_attr: Storage for kobject attribute fabric_cluster_id
* @package_id_kobj_attr: Storage for kobject attribute package_id
+ * @elc_low_threshold_percent_kobj_attr:
+ Storage for kobject attribute elc_low_threshold_percent
+ * @elc_high_threshold_percent_kobj_attr:
+ Storage for kobject attribute elc_high_threshold_percent
+ * @elc_high_threshold_enable_kobj_attr:
+ Storage for kobject attribute elc_high_threshold_enable
+ * @elc_floor_freq_khz_kobj_attr: Storage for kobject attribute elc_floor_freq_khz
* @uncore_attrs: Attribute storage for group creation
*
* This structure is used to encapsulate all data related to uncore sysfs
@@ -61,7 +68,11 @@ struct uncore_data {
struct kobj_attribute domain_id_kobj_attr;
struct kobj_attribute fabric_cluster_id_kobj_attr;
struct kobj_attribute package_id_kobj_attr;
- struct attribute *uncore_attrs[9];
+ struct kobj_attribute elc_low_threshold_percent_kobj_attr;
+ struct kobj_attribute elc_high_threshold_percent_kobj_attr;
+ struct kobj_attribute elc_high_threshold_enable_kobj_attr;
+ struct kobj_attribute elc_floor_freq_khz_kobj_attr;
+ struct attribute *uncore_attrs[13];
};
#define UNCORE_DOMAIN_ID_INVALID -1
--
2.43.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-21 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-21 13:10 [PATCH 0/3] platform/x86: Add support for Intel uncore ELC feature Tero Kristo
2024-08-21 13:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] Documentation: admin-guide: pm: Add efficiency vs. latency tradeoff to uncore documentation Tero Kristo
2024-08-23 12:28 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-08-26 14:45 ` srinivas pandruvada
2024-08-27 8:08 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-08-27 11:30 ` srinivas pandruvada
2024-08-27 13:34 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-08-21 13:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] platform/x86/intel-uncore-freq: Add support for efficiency latency control Tero Kristo
2024-08-23 12:48 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-08-26 15:55 ` srinivas pandruvada
2024-08-21 13:10 ` Tero Kristo [this message]
2024-08-23 13:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] platform/x86/intel-uncore-freq: Add efficiency latency control to sysfs interface Ilpo Järvinen
2024-08-23 13:12 ` srinivas pandruvada
2024-08-23 13:29 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-08-23 14:43 ` srinivas pandruvada
2024-08-26 9:37 ` Ilpo Järvinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240821131321.824326-4-tero.kristo@linux.intel.com \
--to=tero.kristo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox