From: "Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@zytor.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
peterz@infradead.org, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
seanjc@google.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: Write FRED RSP0 on return to userspace
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:39:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240822073906.2176342-1-xin@zytor.com> (raw)
This patch set moves writing MSR_IA32_FRED_RSP0 to return to userspace
from context switch.
In the discussion of save/restore host/guest FRED RSP0 for KVM, Sean
proposed to have the kernel write MSR_IA32_FRED_RSP0 on return to
userspace, i.e., arch_exit_to_user_mode_prepare(), instead of on context
switch. [1]
hpa suggested to test ti_work for zero and then process individual bits
in arch_exit_to_user_mode_prepare. And a quick measurement shows that
in most cases, ti_work values passed to arch_exit_to_user_mode_prepare()
are zeros, e.g., 99% in kernel build tests. This zero test change was
then sent to Intel 0day tests, and no perf regression is reported.
Besides, per the discussion of how to write MSR_IA32_FRED_RSP0 with the
introduction of WRMSRNS [2], use the alternatives mechanism to choose
WRMSRNS when it's available, otherwise fallback to WRMSR.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZpkfkSMPiXrS9r2K@google.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/15f56e6a-6edd-43d0-8e83-bb6430096514@citrix.com/
Andrew Cooper (1):
x86/msr: Switch between WRMSRNS and WRMSR with the alternatives
mechanism
Xin Li (Intel) (2):
x86/entry: Test ti_work for zero before processing individual bits
x86/entry: Set FRED RSP0 on return to userspace instead of context
switch
arch/x86/include/asm/entry-common.h | 13 +++++++++++--
arch/x86/include/asm/fred.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h | 25 +++++++++++--------------
arch/x86/include/asm/switch_to.h | 6 +-----
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c | 1 -
arch/x86/kernel/fred.c | 3 +++
6 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
base-commit: b34bbe44b8222d43d6311d5caa1226ebddda4bfb
--
2.46.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-08-22 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-22 7:39 Xin Li (Intel) [this message]
2024-08-22 7:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/entry: Test ti_work for zero before processing individual bits Xin Li (Intel)
2024-08-25 17:28 ` [tip: x86/fred] " tip-bot2 for Xin Li (Intel)
2024-08-22 7:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/msr: Switch between WRMSRNS and WRMSR with the alternatives mechanism Xin Li (Intel)
2024-08-25 17:28 ` [tip: x86/fred] " tip-bot2 for Andrew Cooper
2024-08-22 7:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/entry: Set FRED RSP0 on return to userspace instead of context switch Xin Li (Intel)
2024-08-25 17:28 ` [tip: x86/fred] " tip-bot2 for Xin Li (Intel)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240822073906.2176342-1-xin@zytor.com \
--to=xin@zytor.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox