From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F48219B5B2; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 22:38:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724711917; cv=none; b=WLSOVuYAKHlWsAN2426CBoniZ3R/fBBHgP1205tqiyIxYvBKSRCqYZlHGsd6qQfQKS9DvbATERbugJMtguv6j5mH3xt1mWMmt6teRWcW/qqVSYVCBlVJ9h1B7+TY9Xu+YXFCTfgG3WmtxDHF4MEZBQO2KrLFqSJWKWCWo6nhdvs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724711917; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sGYNWyOH1CghbLg8bcfIII/QyfEhcnZ+2s06PiUOs2g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=uY5HIryZkISN/FVlMcHOt4UDO9vAU2MZDSJCz1AK+sAfL34nZVio7APtK8l97r85VXR+ZX+bt3cmMLGuWc7Oj3H11T145fN18TQnTPGVOiD7kk8IhgETZLvFfUc4Hj9IG/aOEUxuJp9VlSbwBSGOJWSJLf60gbP0Q4NSgUJIsc8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=hm857V9Q; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="hm857V9Q" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1724711916; x=1756247916; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=sGYNWyOH1CghbLg8bcfIII/QyfEhcnZ+2s06PiUOs2g=; b=hm857V9QWSyYSwDD69TZ7ZcjHWJFfkCOhnpak+cgFJXVpj/4jsud1qme Vt/u7NdoB8cwovBXllaGiq/moS15vqzYo/QT7HOXxgzpFrfSQ3pVew4Sc oiR63xMKfu4BdstNE989fBfl+V0XxGElsgRfhBsJmHkHT95zMzmkDqhnx 9Ju1bTv7kVTrGgNGGHNtKmJkSy0YnukI7tTXkFizJONrkSiB92prdNYX/ YDd14Go9vhHpNaJhyu7BAr3hWJhiIbanvHbDplJFOS58pPeLBKOObQ/3k S45+Ot1FoPBoDu5p3bCamF/SC+xh2jSpLf+u5wlNvWkfL9A382UBXhHs9 g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 8MqRhYasSC+hQ4Ic+VfFug== X-CSE-MsgGUID: WuuMUm9mQ1G3yZIRQgVztg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11176"; a="26956214" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,178,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="26956214" Received: from orviesa008.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.148]) by orvoesa106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Aug 2024 15:38:36 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 90MxcbMcS7mFHJJdrZE2Yw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: /PRYL0HGSLSOnHw4npvl3A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,178,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="63382602" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 9a732dc145d3) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Aug 2024 15:38:32 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 9a732dc145d3 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1siiM1-000HfK-39; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 22:38:30 +0000 Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 06:38:25 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Matthew Rosato , joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, schnelle@linux.ibm.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, jgg@ziepe.ca, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com, jroedel@suse.de, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] iommu/s390: Implement blocking domain Message-ID: <202408270611.sr21RBzy-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240823203108.304054-1-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240823203108.304054-1-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> Hi Matthew, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on s390/features] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.11-rc5 next-20240826] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Matthew-Rosato/iommu-s390-Implement-blocking-domain/20240826-163744 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git features patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240823203108.304054-1-mjrosato%40linux.ibm.com patch subject: [PATCH v3] iommu/s390: Implement blocking domain config: s390-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240827/202408270611.sr21RBzy-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240827/202408270611.sr21RBzy-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408270611.sr21RBzy-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/linux/bug.h:5, from include/linux/fortify-string.h:6, from include/linux/string.h:374, from include/linux/uuid.h:11, from include/linux/mod_devicetable.h:14, from include/linux/pci.h:27, from drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c:9: drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c: In function 'zpci_get_iommu_ctrs': >> include/linux/lockdep.h:252:61: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'spinlock_t' {aka 'struct spinlock'}) 252 | #define lockdep_is_held(lock) lock_is_held(&(lock)->dep_map) | ^~ arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h:54:32: note: in definition of macro 'WARN_ON' 54 | int __ret_warn_on = !!(x); \ | ^ include/linux/lockdep.h:285:9: note: in expansion of macro 'lockdep_assert' 285 | lockdep_assert(lockdep_is_held(l) != LOCK_STATE_NOT_HELD) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/lockdep.h:285:24: note: in expansion of macro 'lockdep_is_held' 285 | lockdep_assert(lockdep_is_held(l) != LOCK_STATE_NOT_HELD) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c:707:9: note: in expansion of macro 'lockdep_assert_held' 707 | lockdep_assert_held(zdev->dom_lock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +252 include/linux/lockdep.h f607c668577481 Peter Zijlstra 2009-07-20 251 f8319483f57f1c Peter Zijlstra 2016-11-30 @252 #define lockdep_is_held(lock) lock_is_held(&(lock)->dep_map) f8319483f57f1c Peter Zijlstra 2016-11-30 253 #define lockdep_is_held_type(lock, r) lock_is_held_type(&(lock)->dep_map, (r)) f607c668577481 Peter Zijlstra 2009-07-20 254 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki