From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 680AD1754B; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 02:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724727290; cv=none; b=pMN+angQ1RNzpr0fVA4EjAo7amRbARc5LnKtgRL0+pnu6qCLw7OKU5DxWlTq1o8u0g12NGgr9mz88nXJm9Z57NCcuxpCv8AF+ZjrtdTKuhJ3Z+EvMw3A1YJnCNVIOaGPl+cVnmYgih1aqDEcGtzz5kjG1GLzq2eN4VgwiDzM6b8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724727290; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rN/h/kIfM1rJjuoXzuWT45K5gm3d2kWicXFFCsPee7Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=T0vjY+T97hmljfr5qh8xEE6SL5LQK4dDYVrneuQx1GLbcn/N8TNawNOQM+bJChpeYolrD4gnXrP5/1EfxqYtg3iOW9GOdUcvLpK6ZNI2YCU5Y7tibkwRLPJrfno4HB6vZvspt09e4pZRWzvv2qcd9aEcAQn+fdOGW2cOndKZpw4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Gy4nyYpV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Gy4nyYpV" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1724727288; x=1756263288; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=rN/h/kIfM1rJjuoXzuWT45K5gm3d2kWicXFFCsPee7Y=; b=Gy4nyYpV7EWN/bVBzYFvVLPZ/+O49tfNB0WQcrpiLNJlIuuk+57T7E8L qg2nnfTH0kqD451vuk39QceyT9Fn3G3Qm7c8Huenz6zjGWjAhjXtgkMQu y8uIvUSuUbrCi3HPIN8uQw9WJ8BWwZASAVxCnT1xdYw6qFXtcFKuvqOt8 SUvesQ76yxA95kx1LMNmL/VMBD/6LO9ISxO6xMuEOkSh3m4oVSug7tR93 1xmwVpvGNBGfk8DpeAOMDjpeAiSIAkATiXlg2j4rivzR6RGKIewXRVbpe xVMSIfKsJ3263nrO3URsMpMOTl8hHNTwBdgKd64lokKKI3sAB+ps5/2L1 g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: oFhbm6QzR/SIzuZ41K94lA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: vyJIRHbzSLWCAiESo1YBkw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11176"; a="34558666" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,179,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="34558666" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Aug 2024 19:54:47 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: cTcBETDLSUSL/e9BUHoeLQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 2653ryGeSqWpa68aqcDMbA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,179,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="62688226" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 9a732dc145d3) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Aug 2024 19:54:43 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 9a732dc145d3 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1simLx-000How-0T; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 02:54:41 +0000 Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:54:11 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Matthew Rosato , joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, schnelle@linux.ibm.com Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, jgg@ziepe.ca, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com, jroedel@suse.de, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] iommu/s390: Implement blocking domain Message-ID: <202408271011.SsRB0mow-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240823203108.304054-1-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240823203108.304054-1-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> Hi Matthew, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on s390/features] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.11-rc5 next-20240826] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Matthew-Rosato/iommu-s390-Implement-blocking-domain/20240826-163744 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git features patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240823203108.304054-1-mjrosato%40linux.ibm.com patch subject: [PATCH v3] iommu/s390: Implement blocking domain config: s390-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240827/202408271011.SsRB0mow-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 08e5a1de8227512d4774a534b91cb2353cef6284) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240827/202408271011.SsRB0mow-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408271011.SsRB0mow-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c:9: In file included from include/linux/pci.h:37: In file included from include/linux/device.h:32: In file included from include/linux/device/driver.h:21: In file included from include/linux/module.h:19: In file included from include/linux/elf.h:6: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/elf.h:181: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h:11: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/pgalloc.h:18: In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2228: include/linux/vmstat.h:500:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 500 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 501 | item]; | ~~~~ include/linux/vmstat.h:507:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 507 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 508 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/vmstat.h:514:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 514 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_" | ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~ include/linux/vmstat.h:519:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 519 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 520 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/vmstat.h:528:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 528 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 529 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c:9: In file included from include/linux/pci.h:39: In file included from include/linux/io.h:14: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93: include/asm-generic/io.h:548:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 548 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:561:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 561 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu' 37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x)) | ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16' 102 | #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x)) | ^ In file included from drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c:9: In file included from include/linux/pci.h:39: In file included from include/linux/io.h:14: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93: include/asm-generic/io.h:574:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 574 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' 35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) | ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32' 115 | #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x)) | ^ In file included from drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c:9: In file included from include/linux/pci.h:39: In file included from include/linux/io.h:14: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93: include/asm-generic/io.h:585:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 585 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:595:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 595 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:605:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 605 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:693:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 693 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:701:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 701 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:709:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 709 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:718:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 718 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:727:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 727 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:736:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 736 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ >> drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c:707:2: error: member reference type 'spinlock_t' (aka 'struct spinlock') is not a pointer; did you mean to use '.'? 707 | lockdep_assert_held(zdev->dom_lock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/lockdep.h:285:17: note: expanded from macro 'lockdep_assert_held' 285 | lockdep_assert(lockdep_is_held(l) != LOCK_STATE_NOT_HELD) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/lockdep.h:252:52: note: expanded from macro 'lockdep_is_held' 252 | #define lockdep_is_held(lock) lock_is_held(&(lock)->dep_map) | ^ include/linux/lockdep.h:279:32: note: expanded from macro 'lockdep_assert' 279 | do { WARN_ON(debug_locks && !(cond)); } while (0) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~ arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h:54:25: note: expanded from macro 'WARN_ON' 54 | int __ret_warn_on = !!(x); \ | ^ >> drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c:707:2: error: cannot take the address of an rvalue of type 'struct lockdep_map' 707 | lockdep_assert_held(zdev->dom_lock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/lockdep.h:285:17: note: expanded from macro 'lockdep_assert_held' 285 | lockdep_assert(lockdep_is_held(l) != LOCK_STATE_NOT_HELD) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/lockdep.h:252:45: note: expanded from macro 'lockdep_is_held' 252 | #define lockdep_is_held(lock) lock_is_held(&(lock)->dep_map) | ^ include/linux/lockdep.h:279:32: note: expanded from macro 'lockdep_assert' 279 | do { WARN_ON(debug_locks && !(cond)); } while (0) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~ arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h:54:25: note: expanded from macro 'WARN_ON' 54 | int __ret_warn_on = !!(x); \ | ^ 17 warnings and 2 errors generated. vim +707 drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c 702 703 struct zpci_iommu_ctrs *zpci_get_iommu_ctrs(struct zpci_dev *zdev) 704 { 705 struct s390_domain *s390_domain; 706 > 707 lockdep_assert_held(zdev->dom_lock); 708 709 if (zdev->s390_domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_BLOCKED) 710 return NULL; 711 712 s390_domain = to_s390_domain(zdev->s390_domain); 713 return &s390_domain->ctrs; 714 } 715 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki